Ferrari R
Chair of Cardiology, University of Brescia, Italy.
Eur Heart J. 1997 Jan;18 Suppl A:A56-70. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/18.suppl_a.56.
The safety of calcium antagonists has recently become a controversial issue among cardiologists. Thus, the role of calcium antagonists in the treatment of myocardial infarction and in secondary cardiovascular prevention is under review. As a consequence, the concept that the words 'calcium antagonists' comprise various drug classes has re-emerged. These differ in basic pharmacological properties, tissue selectivity, pharmacokinetics, and final haemodynamic effect. Obviously, such differences alter their therapeutic effect. In this article, the major differences among the three classes of calcium antagonists, phenylalkylamines, dihydropyridines and benzothiazepines, are discussed and reviewed. A comparative analysis of available clinical trials focusing on the usefulness of each drug class is provided for the reader's interest. Some particularly relevant pathological conditions are considered: chronic stable angina pectoris, vasospastic angina, unstable angina pectoris with threatened myocardial infarction, myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure.
钙拮抗剂的安全性最近在心脏病学家中已成为一个有争议的问题。因此,钙拮抗剂在心肌梗死治疗及二级心血管预防中的作用正在接受重新审视。结果,“钙拮抗剂”一词包含多种药物类别这一概念再次出现。这些药物在基本药理特性、组织选择性、药代动力学及最终血流动力学效应方面存在差异。显然,这些差异会改变它们的治疗效果。在本文中,将对三类钙拮抗剂,即苯烷基胺类、二氢吡啶类和苯并硫氮䓬类之间的主要差异进行讨论和综述。为了读者的兴趣,还提供了针对各类药物效用的现有临床试验的比较分析。文中考虑了一些特别相关的病理状况:慢性稳定型心绞痛、血管痉挛性心绞痛、伴有心肌梗死风险的不稳定型心绞痛、心肌梗死以及充血性心力衰竭。