• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动按压-减压心肺复苏术作为院前高级心脏生命支持的益处:一项随机多中心研究。

Benefit of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation as a prehospital advanced cardiac life support. A randomized multicenter study.

作者信息

Plaisance P, Adnet F, Vicaut E, Hennequin B, Magne P, Prudhomme C, Lambert Y, Cantineau J P, Léopold C, Ferracci C, Gizzi M, Payen D

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France.

出版信息

Circulation. 1997 Feb 18;95(4):955-61. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.4.955.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.95.4.955
PMID:9054757
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We compared short-term prognosis of active compression-decompression (ACD) and standard (STD) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We randomized advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) with ACD ACLS CPR on odd days and STD ACLS CPR on even days. We measured the rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival at 1 hour (H1), at 24 hours (H24), and at 1 month (D30): hospital discharge (HD); neurological outcome; and complications. Mean times from collapse to basic cardiac life support CPR was 9 minutes and from collapse to ACLS CPR was 21 minutes. Compared with the STD ACLS patients (n = 258), ACD ACLS patients (n = 254) had higher survival rates (ROSC, 44.9% versus 29.8%, P = .0004; H1, 36.6% versus 24.8%, P = .003; H24, 26% versus 13.6%, P = .002; HD without neurological impairment, 5.5% versus 1.9%, P = .03) and a trend for improvement in neurological outcome at D30 (Glasgow-Pittsburgh Outcome Categories = 1.6 +/- 0.8 versus 2.3 +/- 1.1. P = .09). Sternal dislodgements (2.9% versus 0.4%, P = .03) and hemoptysis (5.4% versus 1.3%, P = .01) were more frequent in the ACD ACLS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite long time intervals, ACD significantly improved short-term survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests compared with STD CPR.

摘要

背景

我们比较了院外心脏骤停时主动按压-减压(ACD)心肺复苏术(CPR)与标准(STD)CPR的短期预后。

方法与结果

我们进行随机分组,在奇数日采用ACD高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)CPR,在偶数日采用STD ACLS CPR。我们测量了自主循环恢复(ROSC)率、1小时(H1)、24小时(H24)和1个月(D30)时的生存率、出院率(HD)、神经功能转归及并发症。从心脏停搏到基础生命支持CPR的平均时间为9分钟,从心脏停搏到ACLS CPR的平均时间为21分钟。与STD ACLS患者(n = 258)相比,ACD ACLS患者(n = 254)的生存率更高(ROSC,44.9%对29.8%,P = .0004;H1,36.6%对24.8%,P = .003;H24,26%对13.6%,P = .002;无神经功能障碍的HD,5.5%对1.9%,P = .03),且D30时神经功能转归有改善趋势(格拉斯哥-匹兹堡转归分类=1.6±0.8对2.3±1.1,P = .09)。ACD ACLS组胸骨移位(2.9%对0.4%,P = .03)和咯血(5.4%对1.3%,P = .01)更为常见。

结论

尽管时间间隔较长,但与STD CPR相比,ACD显著提高了院外心脏骤停的短期生存率。

相似文献

1
Benefit of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation as a prehospital advanced cardiac life support. A randomized multicenter study.主动按压-减压心肺复苏术作为院前高级心脏生命支持的益处:一项随机多中心研究。
Circulation. 1997 Feb 18;95(4):955-61. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.4.955.
2
Comparison of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus the combination of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and an inspiratory impedance threshold device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停时标准心肺复苏与主动按压-减压心肺复苏联合吸气阻抗阈值装置的比较。
Circulation. 2003 Nov 4;108(18):2201-5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095787.99180.B5. Epub 2003 Oct 20.
3
Evaluation of active compression-decompression CPR in victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停患者实施主动按压-减压心肺复苏术的评估
JAMA. 1994 May 11;271(18):1405-11.
4
Prehospital Advanced Cardiac Life Support for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Cohort Study.院外心脏骤停的院前高级心脏生命支持:一项队列研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;24(9):1100-1109. doi: 10.1111/acem.13246. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
5
ACD versus standard CPR in a prehospital setting.院前环境下的主动循环按压与标准心肺复苏术对比
Resuscitation. 1996 Dec;33(2):117-24. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01021-0.
6
A randomized clinical trial of active compression-decompression CPR vs standard CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in two cities.在两个城市进行的院外心脏骤停患者中,主动按压-减压心肺复苏与标准心肺复苏的随机临床试验。
JAMA. 1995 Apr 26;273(16):1261-8.
7
The United Kingdom pre-hospital study of active compression-decompression resuscitation.英国院前主动按压-减压复苏研究。
Resuscitation. 1998 May;37(2):119-25. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(98)00045-8.
8
A comparison of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation and active compression-decompression resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. French Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Study Group.院外心脏骤停标准心肺复苏与主动按压-减压复苏的比较。法国主动按压-减压心肺复苏研究小组。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 19;341(8):569-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908193410804.
9
The Ontario trial of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital and prehospital cardiac arrest.安大略省关于院内心脏骤停和院外心脏骤停的主动按压-减压心肺复苏试验。
JAMA. 1996 May 8;275(18):1417-23.
10
Intravenous drug administration during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial.院外心脏骤停期间的静脉内给药:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2009 Nov 25;302(20):2222-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1729.

引用本文的文献

1
Manual and Mechanical Induced Peri-Resuscitation Injuries-Post-Mortem and Clinical Findings.手动和机械诱导的复苏期损伤-尸检和临床发现。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 22;19(16):10434. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610434.
2
The Development of Innovative Handheld Devices to Augment Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Therapy and External Cardioversion and Defibrillation.用于增强心肺复苏治疗及体外心脏复律和除颤的创新性手持设备的研发。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2017 Dec 15;8(12):2930-2938. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2017.081201. eCollection 2017 Dec.
3
Cardiothoracic injuries after CardioPump CPR: a report of two cases and review of the literature.
心肺泵心肺复苏术后的心胸损伤:两例报告及文献复习
Int J Legal Med. 2018 May;132(3):771-774. doi: 10.1007/s00414-017-1701-8. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
4
The Efficacy of LUCAS in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Scenarios: A Crossover Mannequin Study.LUCAS在院外心脏骤停场景中的疗效:一项交叉模拟人研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;18(3):437-445. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.1.32575. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
5
Traumatic injuries after mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (LUCAS2): a forensic autopsy study.机械心肺复苏(LUCAS2)后的创伤性损伤:一项法医尸检研究
Int J Legal Med. 2015 Sep;129(5):1035-42. doi: 10.1007/s00414-015-1146-x. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
6
Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) versus standard CPR for cardiac arrest patients: a meta-analysis.主动按压-减压心肺复苏(CPR)与标准 CPR 治疗心搏骤停患者的效果比较:一项荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Med. 2013;4(4):266-72. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2013.04.004.
7
[Mechanical resuscitation assist devices].[机械复苏辅助设备]
Anaesthesist. 2014 Mar;63(3):186-97. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2265-8.
8
Active chest compression-decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.用于心肺复苏的主动胸外按压-减压
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 20;2013(9):CD002751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002751.pub3.
9
Part 7: CPR techniques and devices: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第七部分:心肺复苏技术和设备:2010 年美国心脏协会心肺复苏和紧急心血管急救指南。
Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S720-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970970.
10
Searching for the evidence in pre-hospital care: a review of randomised controlled trials. On behalf of the Ambulance Response Time Sub-Group of the National Ambulance Advisory Committee.在院前急救中寻找证据:随机对照试验综述。代表国家救护车咨询委员会救护车反应时间分组。
J Accid Emerg Med. 1999 Jan;16(1):18-23. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.1.18.