Kendler K S, Gardner C O, Prescott C A
Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Medical College of Virginia/Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Mar;154(3):322-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.3.322.
The authors sought to 1) understand the sources of familial resemblance for religiosity, 2) clarify the relationship between religiosity and current psychiatric symptoms, current substance use, lifetime psychiatric disorders, and lifetime substance dependence, and 3) explore the stress-buffering properties of religiosity.
Data were obtained by personal interview of 1,902 twins from female-female pairs in the population-based Virginia Twin Registry. Measures included 1) 10 items reflecting a range of religious behavior and beliefs, 2) a scale of institutional conservatism of current religious affiliation, 3) previous history of stressful life events, 4) current psychiatric symptoms and substance use, and 5) lifetime psychiatric disorders and substance dependence. Statistical methods used included factor analyses, Cox and linear regression, and twin modeling.
Personal devotion and personal and institutional conservatism were all strongly familial, and model fitting suggested that this familial resemblance was due largely to the effect of environmental factors. None of the dimensions of religiosity was strongly associated with lifetime psychopathology or current symptoms, but low levels of depressive symptoms were related to high levels of personal devotion. By contrast, personal devotion and personal and institutional conservatism were significantly and inversely associated with current levels of drinking and smoking as well as lifetime risk for alcoholism and nicotine dependence. Personal devotion, but not personal or institutional conservatism, buffered the depressogenic effects of stressful life events.
The dimensions of religiosity are not strongly related to risk for psychiatric symptoms and disorders. However, religiosity may be one of the more important familial-environmental factors that affect the risk for substance use and dependence. Religious devotion but not conservatism assists in coping with stress.
作者试图1)了解宗教虔诚度的家族相似性来源,2)阐明宗教虔诚度与当前精神症状、当前物质使用、终生精神障碍及终生物质依赖之间的关系,3)探究宗教虔诚度的压力缓冲特性。
通过对弗吉尼亚州基于人群的双胞胎登记处中1902对女性双胞胎进行个人访谈获取数据。测量指标包括:1)反映一系列宗教行为和信仰的10个项目,2)当前宗教归属的制度保守主义量表,3)过去应激性生活事件的病史,4)当前精神症状和物质使用情况,5)终生精神障碍和物质依赖情况。所使用的统计方法包括因子分析、Cox回归和线性回归以及双胞胎建模。
个人虔诚度以及个人和制度保守主义均具有很强的家族性,模型拟合表明这种家族相似性很大程度上归因于环境因素的影响。宗教虔诚度的各个维度均与终生精神病理学或当前症状无强烈关联,但低水平的抑郁症状与高水平的个人虔诚度相关。相比之下,个人虔诚度以及个人和制度保守主义与当前饮酒和吸烟水平以及酒精中毒和尼古丁依赖的终生风险显著负相关。个人虔诚度而非个人或制度保守主义缓冲了应激性生活事件的致抑郁作用。
宗教虔诚度的各个维度与精神症状和障碍的风险无强烈关联。然而,宗教虔诚度可能是影响物质使用和依赖风险的较为重要的家族环境因素之一。宗教虔诚而非保守主义有助于应对压力。