Koran L M, Sallee F R, Pallanti S
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA 94305, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Mar;154(3):396-401. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.3.396.
The authors conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous versus oral pulse loading of clomipramine in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder to test two hypotheses: 1) intravenous pulse loading will cause greater immediate improvement than oral pulse loading and 2) patients who respond to pulse loading will continue to improve during 8 weeks of oral clomipramine treatment.
Fifteen patients with DSM-III-R obsessive-compulsive disorder of at least 1 year's duration and baseline Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale scores of 17 or higher were enrolled in the study. Yale-Brown scale ratings were made 4.5 days after double-blind oral or intravenous pulse loading of clomipramine, and patients were then given 150 mg/day of oral clomipramine with increases of 25 mg every 4 days to 250 mg/day as tolerated or, in two cases, other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).
The first hypothesis was confirmed: 4.5 days after the second pulse-loaded dose, six of seven patients given intravenous clomipramine but only one of eight given oral medication responded to the drug. After 8 weeks of oral clomipramine, the results partially supported the second hypothesis: four of six patients who had responded to intravenous clomipramine continued their improvement, but those who had responded to pulse loading did not improve statistically significantly more than those who had not.
Intravenous pulse loading of clomipramine may be a valuable new treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder, particularly for patients who have failed oral treatment trials.
作者针对强迫症患者开展了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,比较氯米帕明静脉注射与口服脉冲式给药,以验证两个假设:1)静脉注射脉冲式给药比口服脉冲式给药能带来更显著的即时改善;2)对脉冲式给药有反应的患者在口服氯米帕明治疗8周期间会持续改善。
15名患有DSM-III-R强迫症且病程至少1年、耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表基线评分在17分及以上的患者参与了该研究。在对氯米帕明进行双盲口服或静脉注射脉冲式给药4.5天后进行耶鲁-布朗量表评分,然后给予患者150毫克/天的口服氯米帕明,根据耐受情况每4天增加25毫克,直至250毫克/天,在两例患者中给予其他选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)。
第一个假设得到证实:在第二次脉冲式给药剂量4.5天后,接受静脉注射氯米帕明的7名患者中有6名对药物有反应,而接受口服药物的8名患者中只有1名有反应。口服氯米帕明8周后,结果部分支持了第二个假设:对静脉注射氯米帕明有反应的6名患者中有4名持续改善,但对脉冲式给药有反应的患者在统计学上并没有比无反应的患者有更显著的改善。
氯米帕明静脉注射脉冲式给药可能是治疗强迫症的一种有价值的新疗法,特别是对于口服治疗试验失败的患者。