Suppr超能文献

氟西汀联合喹硫平或氯米帕明与氟西汀联合安慰剂治疗强迫症的双盲、随机、对照试验。

A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of fluoxetine plus quetiapine or clomipramine versus fluoxetine plus placebo for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

机构信息

Department & Institute of Psychiatry, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011 Dec;31(6):763-8. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3182367aee.

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder patients who do not improve sufficiently after treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor might improve further if other drugs were added to the treatment regimen. The authors present a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the efficacy of adding quetiapine or clomipramine to a treatment regimen consisting of fluoxetine. Between May 2007 and March 2010, a total of 54 patients with a primary diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder, as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, and a current Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score of at least 16, the score having dropped by less than 35% after fluoxetine monotherapy, were allocated to 1 of 3 arms (n = 18 per arm): quetiapine + fluoxetine (≤200 and ≤40 mg/d, respectively), clomipramine + fluoxetine (≤75 and ≤40 mg/d, respectively), or placebo + fluoxetine (≤80 mg/d of fluoxetine). Follow-up was 12 weeks. The Y-BOCS scores were the main outcome measure. No severe adverse events occurred during the trial, and 40 patients (74%) completed the 12-week protocol. The Y-BOCS scores (mean [SD]) were significantly better in the placebo + fluoxetine and clomipramine + fluoxetine groups than in the quetiapine + fluoxetine group (final: 18 [7] and 18 [7], respectively, vs 25 [6], P < 0.001) (reduction from baseline: -6.7 [confidence interval {CI}, -9.6 to -3.8; and -6.5 [CI, -9.0 to -3.9], respectively, vs -0.1 [CI, -2.9 to 2.7], P < 0.001; number needed to treat = 2.4). The clomipramine-fluoxetine combination is a safe and effective treatment for fluoxetine nonresponders, especially those who cannot tolerate high doses of fluoxetine. However, the period of monotherapy with the maximum dose of fluoxetine should be extended before a combination treatment strategy is applied.

摘要

强迫症患者在接受选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗后,如果在治疗方案中添加其他药物,可能会进一步改善。作者进行了一项双盲、安慰剂对照试验,比较了在氟西汀治疗方案中添加喹硫平和氯米帕明的疗效。2007 年 5 月至 2010 年 3 月,共有 54 名符合《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)强迫症诊断标准的强迫症患者和当前耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)评分至少为 16 分的患者(氟西汀单药治疗后评分下降不到 35%)被分配到 3 个治疗组中的 1 个(每组 18 名患者):喹硫平+氟西汀(分别≤200 和≤40mg/d)、氯米帕明+氟西汀(分别≤75 和≤40mg/d)或安慰剂+氟西汀(氟西汀≤80mg/d)。随访时间为 12 周。Y-BOCS 评分是主要的观察指标。试验过程中未发生严重不良事件,40 名患者(74%)完成了 12 周方案。安慰剂+氟西汀和氯米帕明+氟西汀组的 Y-BOCS 评分(均数[标准差])显著优于喹硫平+氟西汀组(最终:分别为 18[7]和 18[7], vs 25[6],P<0.001)(从基线的降低值:分别为-6.7[置信区间{CI},-9.6 至-3.8;和-6.5[CI,-9.0 至-3.9], vs -0.1[CI,-2.9 至 2.7],P<0.001;需要治疗的人数=2.4)。氯米帕明-氟西汀联合治疗是氟西汀无反应者的一种安全有效的治疗方法,尤其是那些不能耐受高剂量氟西汀的患者。然而,在应用联合治疗策略之前,应延长氟西汀最大剂量的单药治疗期。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验