Moon M R, Bolger A F, DeAnda A, Komeda M, Daughters G T, Nikolic S D, Miller D C, Ingels N B
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Stanford (Calif) University School of Medicine 94305, USA.
Circulation. 1997 Mar 4;95(5):1320-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.5.1320.
Left ventricular (LV) unloading with mechanical support devices alters biventricular geometry and impairs right ventricular (RV) contractility, but its effect on septal systolic function remains unknown.
To evaluate the effects of LV volume and pressure unloading on septal geometry and function, LV preload was abruptly reduced by clamping left atrial pressure between 0 and -2 mm Hg in seven open-chest, anesthetized dogs by use of a pressure-control servomechanism to withdraw blood from the left atrium. With left atrial pressure clamping, maximal LV pressure decreased 30 +/- 12% (mean +/- SD) (P < .0001) and LV end-diastolic cross-sectional area (determined by two-dimensional echocardiography) decreased by 53 +/- 16% (P < .0001). This caused the septum to shift toward the left (RV septal free-wall dimension increased; P < .004) and flatten (radius of curvature increased; P < .0002), while LV septal free-wall dimension fell (P < .0001). Septal end-diastolic thickness increased 23 +/- 15% (P < .0005), reflecting a decline in septal preload. Systolic septal thickening decreased (P < .002), while systolic septal output (Septal Output = Septal Thickening x Heart Rate) fell from 30 +/- 17 to 15 +/- 22 cm/min (P < .002). This was associated with movement along the septal Frank-Starling equivalent (septal output versus end-diastolic septal thickness [preload] relation) to a less productive portion of the curve.
LV unloading not only altered interventricular septal geometry but also reduced septal systolic thickening and output, all of which may contribute to impaired RV contractility during mechanical LV support.
使用机械支持装置减轻左心室(LV)负荷会改变双心室几何形状并损害右心室(RV)收缩力,但其对室间隔收缩功能的影响尚不清楚。
为了评估左心室容量和压力卸载对室间隔几何形状和功能的影响,在7只开胸麻醉犬中,通过使用压力控制伺服机制从左心房抽血,将左心房压力突然夹闭在0至 -2 mmHg之间,从而突然降低左心室前负荷。随着左心房压力夹闭,左心室最大压力降低30±12%(平均值±标准差)(P<.0001),左心室舒张末期横截面积(通过二维超声心动图测定)降低53±16%(P<.0001)。这导致室间隔向左移位(右心室间隔游离壁尺寸增加;P<.004)并变平(曲率半径增加;P<.0002),而左心室间隔游离壁尺寸减小(P<.0001)。室间隔舒张末期厚度增加23±15%(P<.0005),反映室间隔前负荷下降。收缩期室间隔增厚减少(P<.002),而收缩期室间隔输出量(室间隔输出量 = 室间隔增厚×心率)从30±17降至15±22 cm/min(P<.002)。这与沿着室间隔Frank-Starling等效曲线(室间隔输出量与舒张末期室间隔厚度[前负荷]关系)向曲线中效率较低的部分移动有关。
左心室卸载不仅改变了室间隔几何形状,还降低了室间隔收缩期增厚和输出量,所有这些都可能导致在机械性左心室支持期间右心室收缩力受损。