Melchert T P, Parker R L
Department of Psychology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409-2051, USA.
Child Abuse Negl. 1997 Feb;21(2):125-35. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(96)00138-x.
Recently a heated controversy emerged regarding recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse, but the prevalence and nature of these memories as well as the relationship between a history of child abuse and childhood memory generally have received limited empirical examination. This study (N = 429 nonclinical participants) found that similar proportions of those reporting histories of sexual, emotional, and physical abuse reported that they had periods without memory for their abuse (19.8%, 11.5%, and 14.9%, respectively). These participants, however, appeared to be referring to both a lack of conscious access to their abuse memories as well as the intentional avoidance of the memories for some period. There was a great deal of variance found in the reported quality of general childhood memory, but this was unrelated to reporting a history of child abuse. In addition, it appears to be normative to recover previously forgotten childhood events, and this too was found to be unrelated to history of child abuse.
最近,关于童年性虐待恢复记忆出现了激烈的争论,但这些记忆的发生率和性质,以及儿童虐待史与童年记忆之间的关系,总体上都受到的实证研究有限。这项研究(N = 429名非临床参与者)发现,报告有性虐待、情感虐待和身体虐待史的人中,有相似比例的人表示他们有过对虐待行为失忆的时期(分别为19.8%、11.5%和14.9%)。然而,这些参与者似乎既指的是在一段时间内缺乏对虐待记忆的有意识提取,也指的是有意回避这些记忆。在报告的一般童年记忆质量方面发现了很大差异,但这与报告有儿童虐待史无关。此外,恢复以前遗忘的童年事件似乎是正常现象,而且这也与儿童虐待史无关。