• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Box-Cox 替代方案下生物等效性程序的稳健性

Robustness of bioequivalence procedures under Box-Cox alternatives.

作者信息

Xiao W, Barron A M, Liu J

机构信息

The American University, Washington, D.C. 20016, USA.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 1997 Mar;7(1):135-55. doi: 10.1080/10543409708835175.

DOI:10.1080/10543409708835175
PMID:9056594
Abstract

This study investigates the robustness of Schuirmann's two one-sided tests procedure under a set of Box-Cox alternatives. A simulation is conducted to study the level of significance and the power of the procedure. Empirical results show that Schuirmann's procedure is robust under Box-Cox alternatives when the mean of the underlying distribution of the reference formulation is known, which suggests that the assumptions of normality or lognormality are sufficient but may not be necessary. It appears that Schuirmann's procedure cannot maintain the proper level of significance when the mean of the reference formulation is unknown, even under the normality or lognormality assumptions.

摘要

本研究考察了Schuirmann双侧检验程序在一组Box-Cox备择假设下的稳健性。进行了一项模拟研究该程序的显著性水平和功效。实证结果表明,当参比制剂潜在分布的均值已知时,Schuirmann程序在Box-Cox备择假设下是稳健的,这表明正态性或对数正态性假设是充分的,但可能不是必要的。当参比制剂的均值未知时,即使在正态性或对数正态性假设下,Schuirmann程序似乎也无法维持适当的显著性水平。

相似文献

1
Robustness of bioequivalence procedures under Box-Cox alternatives.Box-Cox 替代方案下生物等效性程序的稳健性
J Biopharm Stat. 1997 Mar;7(1):135-55. doi: 10.1080/10543409708835175.
2
Evaluation of parametric and nonparametric two one-sided tests procedures for assessing bioequivalence of average bioavailability.用于评估平均生物利用度生物等效性的参数和非参数双单侧检验程序的评价
J Biopharm Stat. 1993 Mar;3(1):85-102. doi: 10.1080/10543409308835050.
3
A two one-sided tests procedure for assessment of individual bioequivalence.用于评估个体生物等效性的双单侧检验法
J Biopharm Stat. 1997 Mar;7(1):49-61. doi: 10.1080/10543409708835169.
4
Bias of two one-sided tests procedures in assessment of bioequivalence.生物等效性评估中双单侧检验程序的偏差。
Stat Med. 1995 Apr 30;14(8):853-61. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780140813.
5
Effect of gastric emptying and entero-hepatic circulation on bioequivalence assessment of ranitidine.胃排空和肠肝循环对雷尼替丁生物等效性评估的影响。
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jul-Aug;32(6):413-9. doi: 10.1358/mf.2010.32.6.1472184.
6
A three-step procedure for assessing bioequivalence in the general mixed model framework.在一般混合模型框架下评估生物等效性的三步程序。
Stat Med. 1996 Dec 30;15(24):2635-55. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961230)15:24<2635::AID-SIM444>3.0.CO;2-X.
7
On TIER method for assessment of individual bioequivalence.用于评估个体生物等效性的TIER方法。
J Biopharm Stat. 1997 Mar;7(1):63-85. doi: 10.1080/10543409708835170.
8
On assessment of bioequivalence under a higher-order crossover design.在高阶交叉设计下的生物等效性评估
J Biopharm Stat. 1992;2(2):239-56. doi: 10.1080/10543409208835042.
9
An adjusted two one-sided t-test for the assessment of bioequivalence with multiple doses.
J Biopharm Stat. 1997 Mar;7(1):157-70. doi: 10.1080/10543409708835176.
10
Robust and bootstrap testing procedures for bioequivalence.生物等效性的稳健和自助法测试程序。
J Biopharm Stat. 1994 Mar;4(1):65-90. doi: 10.1080/10543409408835073.