Suppr超能文献

适用于机械通气期间使用的电化学一氧化氮和二氧化氮分析仪的评估。

Evaluation of electrochemical nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide analyzers suitable for use during mechanical ventilation.

作者信息

Purtz E P, Hess D, Kacmarek R M

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Monit. 1997 Jan;13(1):25-34. doi: 10.1023/a:1007301912697.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) is increasingly being used in the treatment of diseases characterized by hypoxemia and pulmonary hypertension. To avoid complications, accurate quantitative analysis of NO and NO2 is necessary during this therapy. We evaluated the accuracy of electrochemical NO and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) analyzers suitable for use during mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

We evaluated six electrochemical NO analyzer brands (Bedfont, B & W, Dräger, EIT, Pulmonox, Saan). All were calibrated and used per manufacturer's specifications. An adult mechanical ventilator was used to produce serial dilutions of NO with O2 for [NO] of 0-80 ppm. F1O2 settings of 0.90, 0.70, 0.50, 0.30, and 0.21 were used. Settings of low, moderate, and high ventilation pressures were evaluated. Gas was sampled from the inspiratory limb of the ventilator circuit using either a sidestream or mainstream technique. [NO] was also measured using a calibrated chemiluminescence analyzer. For the analyzers that measured NO2, serial dilutions of 8.5 ppm NO2 with O2 were analyzed using chemiluminescence and the electrochemical analyzers.

RESULTS

Bias +/- precision for [NO] by individual devices ranged from 1.8 +/- 1.9 ppm to -1.0 +/- 0.7 ppm. There were significant differences in the bias between analyzers (P < 0.001), pressure settings (P < 0.001), and NO level (P < 0.017). The difference in bias between levels of F1O2 was not significant (P = 0.062). Bias +/- precision for NO2 ranged from 0.18 +/- 0.12 ppm to -0.14 +/- 0.13 ppm, with a significant difference between analyzers (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The bias and precision of these analyzers was acceptable for clinical use. The devices tended to be most accurate at [NO] < or = 20 ppm-the clinical conditions at which NO is most commonly used.

摘要

目的

吸入一氧化氮(NO)越来越多地用于治疗以低氧血症和肺动脉高压为特征的疾病。为避免并发症,在该治疗过程中对NO和NO2进行准确的定量分析是必要的。我们评估了适用于机械通气期间使用的电化学NO和二氧化氮(NO2)分析仪的准确性。

方法

我们评估了六个电化学NO分析仪品牌(Bedfont、B&W、德尔格、EIT、Pulmonox、Saan)。所有仪器均按照制造商的规格进行校准和使用。使用成人机械通气机用氧气对NO进行系列稀释,使[NO]为0 - 80 ppm。使用的F1O2设置为0.90、0.70、0.50、0.30和0.21。评估了低、中、高通气压力设置。使用旁流或主流技术从通气机回路的吸气支采样气体。[NO]也使用校准的化学发光分析仪进行测量。对于测量NO2的分析仪,使用化学发光分析仪和电化学分析仪分析用氧气对8.5 ppm NO2进行的系列稀释。

结果

各仪器对[NO]的偏差±精密度范围为1.8±1.9 ppm至 - 1.0±0.7 ppm。分析仪之间的偏差(P < 0.001)、压力设置(P < 0.001)和NO水平(P < 0.017)存在显著差异。F1O2水平之间偏差的差异不显著(P = 0.062)。NO2的偏差±精密度范围为0.18±0.12 ppm至 - 0.14±0.13 ppm,分析仪之间存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。

结论

这些分析仪的偏差和精密度在临床上是可以接受的。这些设备在[NO]≤20 ppm时往往最准确,而这正是NO最常用的临床条件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验