Avalos R T, Yu Z, Nayak D P
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095-1747, USA.
J Virol. 1997 Apr;71(4):2947-58. doi: 10.1128/JVI.71.4.2947-2958.1997.
We have investigated the association of the influenza virus matrix (M1) and nucleoprotein (NP) with the host cell cytoskeletal elements in influenza virus-infected MDCK and MDBK cells. At 6.5 h postinfection, the newly synthesized M1 was Triton X-100 (TX-100) extractable but became resistant to TX-100 extraction during the chase with a t1/2 of 20 min. NP, on the other hand, acquired TX-100 resistance immediately after synthesis. Significant fractions of both M1 and NP remained resistant to differential detergent (Triton X-114, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate [CHAPS], octylglucoside) extraction, suggesting that M1 and NP were interacting with the cytoskeletal elements. However, the high-molecular-weight form of the viral transmembrane protein hemagglutinin (HA), which had undergone complex glycosylation, also became resistant to TX-100 extraction but was sensitive to octylglucoside detergent extraction, indicating that HA, unlike M1 or NP, was interacting with TX-100-insoluble lipids and not with cytoskeletal elements. Morphological analysis with cytoskeletal disrupting agents demonstrated that M1 and NP were associated with microfilaments in virus-infected cells. However, M1, expressed alone in MDCK or HeLa cells from cloned cDNA or coexpressed with NP, did not become resistant to TX-100 extraction even after a long chase. NP, on the other hand, became TX-100 insoluble as in the virus-infected cells. M1 also did not acquire TX-100 insolubility in ts 56 (a temperature-sensitive mutant with a defect in NP protein)-infected cells at the nonpermissive temperature. Furthermore, early in the infectious cycle in WSN-infected cells, M1 acquired TX-100 resistance very slowly after a long chase and did not acquire TX-100 resistance at all when chased in the presence of cycloheximide. On the other hand, late in the infectious cycle, M1 acquired TX-100 resistance when chased in either the presence or absence of cycloheximide. Taken together, these results demonstrate that M1 and NP interact with host microfilaments in virus-infected cells and that M1 requires other viral proteins or subviral components (possibly viral ribonucleoprotein) for interaction with host cytoskeletal components. The implication of these results for viral morphogenesis is discussed.
我们研究了流感病毒基质蛋白(M1)和核蛋白(NP)与流感病毒感染的犬肾上皮细胞(MDCK)和牛肾细胞(MDBK)中宿主细胞细胞骨架成分的关联。感染后6.5小时,新合成的M1可被 Triton X - 100(TX - 100)提取,但在追踪过程中对TX - 100提取产生抗性,半衰期为20分钟。另一方面,NP在合成后立即获得对TX - 100的抗性。M1和NP的相当一部分对不同去污剂(Triton X - 114、3 - [(3 - 胆酰胺丙基)二甲基铵基]-1 - 丙烷磺酸盐[CHAPS]、辛基葡糖苷)提取仍具有抗性,这表明M1和NP与细胞骨架成分相互作用。然而,经历了复杂糖基化的病毒跨膜蛋白血凝素(HA)的高分子量形式也对TX - 100提取产生抗性,但对辛基葡糖苷去污剂提取敏感,这表明与M1或NP不同,HA与TX - 100不溶性脂质相互作用,而不是与细胞骨架成分相互作用。用细胞骨架破坏剂进行的形态学分析表明,M1和NP与病毒感染细胞中的微丝相关。然而,单独从克隆的cDNA在MDCK或HeLa细胞中表达的M1,或与NP共表达的M1,即使经过长时间追踪也不会对TX - 100提取产生抗性。另一方面,NP如在病毒感染细胞中一样变得不溶于TX - 100。在非允许温度下,M1在ts 56(一种NP蛋白有缺陷的温度敏感突变体)感染的细胞中也不会获得对TX - 100的不溶性。此外,在WSN感染细胞的感染周期早期,经过长时间追踪后,M1对TX - 100的抗性获得非常缓慢,并且在存在环己酰亚胺追踪时根本不会获得对TX - 100的抗性。另一方面,在感染周期后期,无论是否存在环己酰亚胺追踪,M1都会获得对TX - 100的抗性。综上所述,这些结果表明M1和NP在病毒感染细胞中与宿主微丝相互作用,并且M1需要其他病毒蛋白或亚病毒成分(可能是病毒核糖核蛋白)才能与宿主细胞骨架成分相互作用。讨论了这些结果对病毒形态发生的意义。