• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童权利以及亲生父母与第三方监护权纠纷中的生物性偏见

Children's rights and the biological bias in biological parent versus third-party custody disputes.

作者信息

Wynne E E

出版信息

Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 1997 Spring;27(3):179-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02353697.

DOI:10.1007/BF02353697
PMID:9062009
Abstract

The overwhelming trend in most courts in the United States today is to respect the rights of parents, rather than to take seriously the interests of the child. Biological parents' rights to ownership of their child remain a priority over the needs and interests of that child. Children need to be considered as persons, not the property of their parents, if we are to respect their interests and developmental needs in legal actions that affect them.

摘要

当今美国大多数法院的压倒性趋势是尊重父母的权利,而不是认真对待孩子的利益。亲生父母对其子女的所有权仍然优先于该子女的需求和利益。如果我们要在影响儿童的法律诉讼中尊重他们的利益和发展需求,就需要将儿童视为人,而不是其父母的财产。

相似文献

1
Children's rights and the biological bias in biological parent versus third-party custody disputes.儿童权利以及亲生父母与第三方监护权纠纷中的生物性偏见
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 1997 Spring;27(3):179-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02353697.
2
Biological parents regaining their rights: a psycholegal analysis of a new era in custody disputes.亲生父母恢复其权利:监护权纠纷新时代的心理法律分析。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1995;23(2):261-7.
3
Balancing competing interests in post-placement adoption custody disputes. How do the scales of justice weigh the rights of biological parents, adoptive parents, and children?平衡安置后收养监护权纠纷中的相互冲突利益。司法天平如何权衡亲生父母、养父母和儿童的权利?
J Leg Med. 1994 Jun;15(2):305-43. doi: 10.1080/01947649409510947.
4
Grandparents' visitation rights and custody.祖父母的探视权和监护权。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 1998 Apr;7(2):409-22.
5
Relocation of children after divorce and children's best interests: new evidence and legal considerations.离婚后子女的迁居与子女的最大利益:新证据与法律考量
J Fam Psychol. 2003 Jun;17(2):206-19. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.17.2.206.
6
Children's adjustment during custody/access disputes: relation to custody arrangement, gender and age of child.
Can J Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;33(6):517-23. doi: 10.1177/070674378803300614.
7
Biased reporting by parents undergoing child custody evaluations.接受子女监护权评估的父母的偏见性报告。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1991 Sep;30(5):835-8.
8
Medical, psychologic, and legal aspects of child custody disputes.儿童监护权纠纷的医学、心理及法律方面
Mayo Clin Proc. 1978 Jul;53(7):463-8.
9
[On the work of Austrian authorised experts on procedures in custodial and visiting rights--a survey of current practice from the parents and children view].[关于奥地利监护权和探视权程序方面的授权专家工作——从父母和子女视角对当前实践的调查]
Neuropsychiatr. 2008;22(4):268-76.
10
A study of families in high-conflict custody disputes: effects of psychiatric evaluation.一项关于高冲突监护权纠纷家庭的研究:精神病学评估的影响。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1990;18(1):85-97.