Soler J J, Perpiñá M, Greses J V, Calvo V, Padilla J, París F
Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia.
Med Clin (Barc). 1997 Jan 25;108(3):81-6.
The specific cell type in primary lung cancer (LC) has important consequences, both for treatment and prognosis. Our objective has been to evaluate the degree of accuracy of several preoperative techniques in the LC diagnosis.
We have studied 442 diagnostic techniques realized in 360 patients who underwent thoracotomy for LC in our hospital (1988-1994). Twelve sputum cytologies, 93 transthoracic needle biopsies (TNB), 73 bronchial aspirated cytologies, 30 bronchial brushing, 205 bronchial biopsies (BB) and 29 transbronchial biopsies were included. In each case the cellular type of LC, obtained through these techniques, was compared with the result derived from the study of surgical piece (reference diagnosis). To calculate the degree of concordance between both diagnoses we used the kappa coefficient (K).
The overall concordance between the cellular type observed in the different preoperative techniques and the definitive result obtained by thoracotomy was 0.61. The worst test was TNB (K = 0.41). Sputum cytology and BB presented a good histopathological precision (K = 0.75 and 0.70 respectively). The rest of techniques showed moderate results. On the different histologies, the best result was obtained in squamous carcinoma (K = 0.68) and the worst in undifferentiated large cell carcinoma (LCC) (K = 0.39). Small-cell lung cancer only showed a moderate concordance (K = 0.58). The coexistence and coincidence of two or more tests with the same cellular type were associated with a higher proportion of accuracy (0.97 vs 0.73; p = 0.00002; odds ratio: 12.02).
The preoperative histopathological diagnoses should be interpreted with caution, especially those obtained by TNB and those where it is implied the LCC. In these two circumstances and in cases in which the knowledge of the cellular type have relevance, we think that the initial diagnosis should be reinforced with a second result. The precision of the preoperative diagnoses in small-cell lung cancer must be reevaluated.
原发性肺癌(LC)的特定细胞类型对治疗和预后均有重要影响。我们的目的是评估几种术前技术在LC诊断中的准确程度。
我们研究了我院360例因LC接受开胸手术的患者(1988 - 1994年)所采用的442项诊断技术。其中包括12次痰细胞学检查、93次经胸针吸活检(TNB)、73次支气管吸出物细胞学检查、30次支气管刷检、205次支气管活检(BB)以及29次经支气管活检。在每例病例中,通过这些技术获取的LC细胞类型与手术标本研究结果(参考诊断)进行比较。为计算两种诊断之间的一致性程度,我们使用了kappa系数(K)。
不同术前技术所观察到的细胞类型与开胸手术最终结果之间的总体一致性为0.61。最差的检查是TNB(K = 0.41)。痰细胞学检查和BB呈现出良好的组织病理学准确性(分别为K = 0.75和0.70)。其余技术显示结果中等。在不同组织学类型中,鳞状细胞癌的结果最佳(K = 0.68),未分化大细胞癌(LCC)的结果最差(K = 0.39)。小细胞肺癌仅显示出中等一致性(K = 0.58)。两种或更多具有相同细胞类型的检查结果共存和相符与更高的准确率相关(0.97对0.73;p = 0.00002;优势比:12.02)。
术前组织病理学诊断应谨慎解读,尤其是通过TNB获得的诊断以及涉及LCC的诊断。在这两种情况下以及细胞类型的了解具有相关性的病例中,我们认为初始诊断应通过第二个结果加以强化。小细胞肺癌术前诊断的准确性必须重新评估。