Zieren J, Zieren H U, Wenger F A, Müller J M
Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Berlin.
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1996;381(5):289-94. doi: 10.1007/BF00184051.
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair by means of the transabdominal preperitoneal technique (TAPP) was compared with open plug-and-patch-repair (PP) in a prospective study. From September 1992 until July 1994, 86 patients were operated using the TAPP technique; after introduction of PP in August 1994, 105 patients were operated using this technique. From August 1994 until April 1995, 24 more patients wanted the laparoscopic procedure. The two groups were comparable with regard to age, sex and the distribution of hernia types. Eighty-eight (84%) of the PP patients were operated under local anesthesia, while the others chose general anesthesia. The only intraoperative complication was a bleeding from the epigastric vessel in the laparoscopic group. Postoperative complications were three wound hematomas after TAPP (2.2%) and two wound hematomas and one superficial wound infection after PP (2.4%). All complications healed spontaneously. No detectable statistical difference was noted between the two groups with respect to postoperative pain, the consumption of analgetics, duration of hospitalization and reconvalescence. After a median follow-up of 34 months, two recurrences after TAPP (1.4%) and no recurrences after PP has been detected. Based on our experience we prefer PP for inguinal hernia repair in adults because it affords the same patient comfort as TAPP but is less expensive and can be performed under local anesthesia.
在一项前瞻性研究中,对采用经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)的腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术与开放式疝环充填式无张力疝修补术(PP)进行了比较。从1992年9月至1994年7月,86例患者采用TAPP技术进行手术;1994年8月引入PP技术后,105例患者采用该技术进行手术。从1994年8月至1995年4月,又有24例患者希望接受腹腔镜手术。两组在年龄、性别和疝类型分布方面具有可比性。88例(84%)PP组患者在局部麻醉下进行手术,其余患者选择全身麻醉。腹腔镜组术中唯一的并发症是上腹部血管出血。术后并发症方面,TAPP术后有3例伤口血肿(2.2%),PP术后有2例伤口血肿和1例浅表伤口感染(2.4%)。所有并发症均自行愈合。两组在术后疼痛、镇痛药使用量、住院时间和康复方面未发现明显统计学差异。中位随访34个月后,TAPP术后发现2例复发(1.4%),PP术后未发现复发。根据我们的经验,我们更倾向于在成人腹股沟疝修补术中采用PP术式,因为它能为患者提供与TAPP相同的舒适度,但费用更低,且可在局部麻醉下进行。