• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹腔镜或传统方法使用合成补片修补腹股沟疝?]

[Laparoscopic or conventional repair of inguinal hernia with synthetic mesh?].

作者信息

Zieren J, Zieren H U, Wenger F A, Müller J M

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Berlin.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1996;381(5):289-94. doi: 10.1007/BF00184051.

DOI:10.1007/BF00184051
PMID:9064469
Abstract

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair by means of the transabdominal preperitoneal technique (TAPP) was compared with open plug-and-patch-repair (PP) in a prospective study. From September 1992 until July 1994, 86 patients were operated using the TAPP technique; after introduction of PP in August 1994, 105 patients were operated using this technique. From August 1994 until April 1995, 24 more patients wanted the laparoscopic procedure. The two groups were comparable with regard to age, sex and the distribution of hernia types. Eighty-eight (84%) of the PP patients were operated under local anesthesia, while the others chose general anesthesia. The only intraoperative complication was a bleeding from the epigastric vessel in the laparoscopic group. Postoperative complications were three wound hematomas after TAPP (2.2%) and two wound hematomas and one superficial wound infection after PP (2.4%). All complications healed spontaneously. No detectable statistical difference was noted between the two groups with respect to postoperative pain, the consumption of analgetics, duration of hospitalization and reconvalescence. After a median follow-up of 34 months, two recurrences after TAPP (1.4%) and no recurrences after PP has been detected. Based on our experience we prefer PP for inguinal hernia repair in adults because it affords the same patient comfort as TAPP but is less expensive and can be performed under local anesthesia.

摘要

在一项前瞻性研究中,对采用经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)的腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术与开放式疝环充填式无张力疝修补术(PP)进行了比较。从1992年9月至1994年7月,86例患者采用TAPP技术进行手术;1994年8月引入PP技术后,105例患者采用该技术进行手术。从1994年8月至1995年4月,又有24例患者希望接受腹腔镜手术。两组在年龄、性别和疝类型分布方面具有可比性。88例(84%)PP组患者在局部麻醉下进行手术,其余患者选择全身麻醉。腹腔镜组术中唯一的并发症是上腹部血管出血。术后并发症方面,TAPP术后有3例伤口血肿(2.2%),PP术后有2例伤口血肿和1例浅表伤口感染(2.4%)。所有并发症均自行愈合。两组在术后疼痛、镇痛药使用量、住院时间和康复方面未发现明显统计学差异。中位随访34个月后,TAPP术后发现2例复发(1.4%),PP术后未发现复发。根据我们的经验,我们更倾向于在成人腹股沟疝修补术中采用PP术式,因为它能为患者提供与TAPP相同的舒适度,但费用更低,且可在局部麻醉下进行。

相似文献

1
[Laparoscopic or conventional repair of inguinal hernia with synthetic mesh?].[腹腔镜或传统方法使用合成补片修补腹股沟疝?]
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1996;381(5):289-94. doi: 10.1007/BF00184051.
2
[Open mesh technique versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach in inguinal hernia repair. Our experience].[开放网片技术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)入路在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用。我们的经验]
G Chir. 2008 Nov-Dec;29(11-12):497-504.
3
Comparison of postoperative short-term complications after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial study.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与Lichtenstein无张力腹股沟疝修补术后短期并发症的比较:一项随机试验研究
Minerva Chir. 2015 Apr;70(2):83-9. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
4
Impact of polypropylene amount on functional outcome and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair by the TAPP procedure using pure, mixed, and titanium-coated meshes.使用纯网片、混合网片和钛涂层网片通过经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)进行腹股沟疝修补术后,聚丙烯用量对功能结局和生活质量的影响。
World J Surg. 2006 Sep;30(9):1742-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0242-3.
5
TEP or TAPP for recurrent inguinal hernia repair-register-based comparison of the outcome.TEP 或 TAPP 治疗复发性腹股沟疝修补术-基于登记的结局比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3872-3882. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5416-1. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
6
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):239-44. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0580-1. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
7
TAPP or TEP for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia? Population-Based Analysis of Prospective Data on 1309 Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Repair for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia.经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)还是完全腹膜外修补术(TEP)用于复发性腹股沟疝?基于人群的1309例接受复发性腹股沟疝内镜修补术患者的前瞻性数据分析
World J Surg. 2016 Oct;40(10):2348-52. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3545-7.
8
Mesh infections after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的补片感染
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997 Jun;7(3):192-5.
9
A Comparison of Outcomes between Lichtenstein and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia.李金斯坦手术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的疗效比较
Am Surg. 2018 Nov 1;84(11):1774-1780.
10
Effectivity of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) in daily clinical practice: early and long-term result.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)在日常临床实践中的有效性:早期和长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4985-4994. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4843-8. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic vs conventional tension free inguinal herniorrhaphy: 2005 society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) annual meeting debate.腹腔镜与传统无张力腹股沟疝修补术:2005年美国胃肠内镜外科医师协会(SAGES)年会辩论
Surg Endosc. 2006 Dec;20(12):1809-16. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-0073-9.
2
Inguinal hernioplasty: the gold standard of hernia repair.腹股沟疝修补术:疝修补的金标准。
Hernia. 2003 Mar;7(1):35-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-002-0095-8. Epub 2002 Dec 17.

本文引用的文献

1
[Transinguinal preperitoneal mesh-plasty in inguinal hernia using local anesthesia].[局部麻醉下经腹股沟腹膜前补片修补术治疗腹股沟疝]
Chirurg. 1996 Apr;67(4):419-24.
2
"Tension-free" inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the "mesh plug" technique.“无张力”腹股沟疝修补术:“网塞”技术的初步报告
Surgery. 1993 Jul;114(1):3-8.
3
A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and tension-free open herniorrhaphy.腹腔镜与无张力开放疝修补术的前瞻性比较
Arch Surg. 1994 Apr;129(4):361-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420280031004.
4
[Lichtenstein patch versus Shouldice technique in primary inguinal hernia with a high risk of recurrence].[原发性腹股沟疝复发风险高时Lichtenstein修补术与Shouldice技术的比较]
Chirurg. 1994 Jan;65(1):59-62; discussion 63.
5
[Laparoscopic hernia surgery].[腹腔镜疝修补术]
Zentralbl Chir. 1993;118(12):759-66.
6
Laparoscopic or open inguinal herniorrhaphy? A randomized prospective trial.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术还是开放腹股沟疝修补术?一项随机前瞻性试验。
Arch Surg. 1994 Sep;129(9):973-9; discussion 979-81. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420330087016.
7
Early complications and outcomes of the current technique of transperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy and a comparison to the traditional open approach.经腹腹腔镜疝修补术当前技术的早期并发症及结果,并与传统开放手术方法进行比较。
Am J Surg. 1994 Sep;168(3):275-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80201-6.
8
[A five-step technique for local anesthesia in inguinal hernia repair].[腹股沟疝修补术中局部麻醉的五步技术]
Chirurg. 1994 Apr;65(4):388-90; discussion 390.
9
A prospective comparison of transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair versus traditional open hernia repair in a university setting.在大学环境中对经腹腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术与传统开放式疝修补术进行前瞻性比较。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994 Aug;4(4):247-53.
10
Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: initial experience in 126 patients.腹腔镜疝修补术:126例患者的初步经验。
J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994 Jun;4(3):179-83. doi: 10.1089/lps.1994.4.179.