• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

李金斯坦手术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的疗效比较

A Comparison of Outcomes between Lichtenstein and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia.

作者信息

Yang Bin, Zhou Shengning, Li Yingru, Tan Jianan, Chen Shuang, Han Fanghai

出版信息

Am Surg. 2018 Nov 1;84(11):1774-1780.

PMID:30747632
Abstract

There remain concerns about the optimal technique for repairing recurrent inguinal hernias because of the high risks of complications and recurrence. The aim of this study was to compare Lichtenstein hernioplasty with the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic technique in the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernias. One hundred twenty-two patients who underwent surgery for recurrent inguinal hernia were prospectively randomized to receive either Lichtenstein (n = 63) or TAPP (n = 59) hernioplasty between January 2010 and December 2014. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative complications, and short- and long-term postoperative factors were evaluated. Preoperative factors were comparable between the two groups. The average follow-up period was 46.2 ± 8.5 months. The two groups had similar intraoperative and short-term postoperative complication rates, whereas the rate of long-term postoperative complications was lower for the TAPP group than the Lichtenstein group (6.8% 23.8%, respectively, = 0.012). The TAPP group had significantly lower visual analogue scale scores, fewer analgesics consumption, and faster recovery than the Lichtenstein group ( < 0.05). Chronic pain was more prevalent in the Lichtenstein group than the TAPP group (15.9% 3.4%, respectively, = 0.031). The recurrence rate was 4.8 per cent for the Lichtenstein group and 1.7 per cent for the TAPP group, with no significant difference ( = 0.62). Both the Lichtenstein and TAPP procedures are safe and effective methods for repairing recurrent inguinal hernia with low incidence rates of life-threatening complications and recurrence. The TAPP procedure is superior to the Lichtenstein repair in terms of reduced postoperative pain, shorter sick leave, faster recovery, and better cosmetic results. Careful selection of the surgical procedures and implementation of technical essentials are necessary.

摘要

由于复发性腹股沟疝修补术并发症和复发风险较高,因此对于其最佳技术仍存在担忧。本研究的目的是比较Lichtenstein疝修补术与经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹腔镜技术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的效果。2010年1月至2014年12月期间,122例行复发性腹股沟疝手术的患者被前瞻性随机分为接受Lichtenstein手术(n = 63)或TAPP手术(n = 59)两组。评估了基线特征、术中并发症以及术后短期和长期因素。两组术前因素具有可比性。平均随访期为46.2±8.5个月。两组术中及术后短期并发症发生率相似,而TAPP组术后长期并发症发生率低于Lichtenstein组(分别为6.8%和23.8%,P = 0.012)。TAPP组视觉模拟评分显著低于Lichtenstein组,镇痛药物使用量更少,恢复更快(P < 0.05)。Lichtenstein组慢性疼痛比TAPP组更普遍(分别为15.9%和3.4%,P = 0.031)。Lichtenstein组复发率为4.8%,TAPP组为1.7%,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.62)。Lichtenstein手术和TAPP手术都是修复复发性腹股沟疝的安全有效方法,危及生命的并发症和复发发生率较低。TAPP手术在减轻术后疼痛、缩短病假、加快恢复和改善美容效果方面优于Lichtenstein修补术。仔细选择手术方法并落实技术要点很有必要。

相似文献

1
A Comparison of Outcomes between Lichtenstein and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia.李金斯坦手术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的疗效比较
Am Surg. 2018 Nov 1;84(11):1774-1780.
2
A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein repair for bilateral inguinal hernias.一项比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与李金斯坦修补术治疗双侧腹股沟疝的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Surg. 2018 Jul;216(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
3
Comparison of Lichtenstein and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of recurrent inguinal hernias.李金斯坦手术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的比较
Int Surg. 2011 Jul-Sep;96(3):233-8. doi: 10.9738/cc53.1.
4
Comparison of open and laparoscopic preperitoneal repair of groin hernia.开放与腹腔镜经腹膜前修补腹股沟疝的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4702-10. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3118-x. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
5
Comparison of postoperative short-term complications after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial study.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与Lichtenstein无张力腹股沟疝修补术后短期并发症的比较:一项随机试验研究
Minerva Chir. 2015 Apr;70(2):83-9. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
6
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
7
A modified laparoscopic hernioplasty (TAPP) is the standard procedure for inguinal and femoral hernias: a retrospective 17-year analysis with 1,123 hernia repairs.改良腹腔镜疝修补术(TAPP)是腹股沟疝和股疝的标准手术:一项对1123例疝修补术的17年回顾性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):671-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3208-9. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
8
Bilateral inguinal hernia repair and male fertility: a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique.双侧腹股沟疝修补术和男性生育能力:一项比较开放式经腹股沟腹膜前修补术(Lichtenstein)与腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前修补术(TAPP)技术的随机临床试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9263-9274. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10499-8. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
9
Lack of advantages of slit mesh placement during laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP): a single centre, case matched study.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)中放置裂隙网片的优势缺失:一项单中心病例匹配研究
BMC Surg. 2018 Sep 20;18(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0409-0.
10
The Novel Technique of Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty Herniorrhaphy for Direct Inguinal Hernia: Suture Repair of Hernia Defect Wall.经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟直疝的新技术:疝缺损壁的缝合修复
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):83-88. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0045. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Inguinodynia following inguinal hernia repair: a comparative analysis of open Lichtenstein and laparoscopic TAPP techniques in a two-center cohort.腹股沟疝修补术后的腹股沟疼痛:两中心队列中开放式Lichtenstein手术与腹腔镜TAPP手术的比较分析
Front Surg. 2025 May 22;12:1590855. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1590855. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of postoperative chronic inguinal pain between the lichtenstein and laparoscopic techniques in the treatment of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经系统评价和荟萃分析比较腹腔镜与传统开放手术治疗腹股沟疝术后慢性腹股沟疼痛的差异。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1537-1546. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03099-5. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
3
Chronic inguinal pain post-hernioplasty. Laparo-endoscopic surgery vs lichtenstein repair: systematic review and meta-analysis.
腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛。腹腔镜手术与李金斯坦修补术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1427-1439. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03077-x. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
4
Varying convalescence recommendations after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic scoping review.不同的腹股沟疝修补术后恢复期建议:系统范围综述。
Hernia. 2022 Aug;26(4):1009-1021. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02629-3. Epub 2022 Jun 29.