• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与Lichtenstein无张力腹股沟疝修补术后短期并发症的比较:一项随机试验研究

Comparison of postoperative short-term complications after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial study.

作者信息

Kargar S, Shiryazdi S M, Zare M, Mirshamsi M H, Ahmadi S, Neamatzadeh H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Yazd, Iran -

出版信息

Minerva Chir. 2015 Apr;70(2):83-9. Epub 2014 Jul 14.

PMID:25017958
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this randomized trial was to compare short-term postoperative complications of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and Lichtenstein tension free hernia repair.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients who went inguinal hernia repair at Shahid Sadoughi university training hospital from April 2011 to August 2013 were randomized into two TAPP (N.=60) and Lichtenstein (N.=60) repair group. Follow-up occurred within 6 weeks. The postoperative assessments included pain score (VAS), hematoma/seroma, urinary retention, wound infection incidence, and duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Pain was the most common symptoms in both groups. The TAPP group patients significantly had experienced less postoperative pain than the Lichtenstein group in all moments (P<0.05). TAPP group had lower incidence of hematoma (TAPP, 6.6% vs. Lichtenstein 13.3%; P=0.67), seroma (TAPP 10% vs. Lichtenstein 13.3%; P=1.00), and infection (TAPP 0 vs. Lichtenstein 1.6%; P=0.67). However, no differences between the 2 groups were found in terms of postoperative complications. In TAPP group mean of hospital stay significantly was less than Lichtenstein group (TAPP, 8.13±2.19 vs. Lichtenstein, 13.15±1.5 days; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic TAPP repair is safer and less complicated approach to inguinal hernia repair. The two main short-term advantages of the laparoscopic TAPP repair with the tension free Lichtenstein repair were less postoperative pain and earlier return to the normal life activities. No difference was seen in overall complications.

摘要

目的

本随机试验旨在比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与李金斯坦无张力疝修补术的术后短期并发症。

方法

2011年4月至2013年8月在沙希德·萨杜基大学教学医院接受腹股沟疝修补术的120例患者被随机分为两组,TAPP组(n = 60)和李金斯坦组(n = 60)。随访在6周内进行。术后评估包括疼痛评分(视觉模拟评分法)、血肿/血清肿、尿潴留、伤口感染发生率及住院时间。

结果

疼痛是两组最常见的症状。TAPP组患者在所有时间点的术后疼痛均明显少于李金斯坦组(P < 0.05)。TAPP组血肿发生率较低(TAPP组为6.6%,李金斯坦组为13.3%;P = 0.67),血清肿发生率较低(TAPP组为10%,李金斯坦组为13.3%;P = 1.00),感染发生率较低(TAPP组为0,李金斯坦组为1.6%;P = 0.67)。然而,两组术后并发症方面未发现差异。TAPP组的平均住院时间明显少于李金斯坦组(TAPP组为8.13±2.19天,李金斯坦组为13.15±1.5天;P < 0.001)。

结论

腹腔镜TAPP修补术是一种更安全、并发症更少的腹股沟疝修补方法。腹腔镜TAPP修补术相对于无张力李金斯坦修补术的两个主要短期优势是术后疼痛更少和能更早恢复正常生活活动。总体并发症方面未见差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of postoperative short-term complications after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial study.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与Lichtenstein无张力腹股沟疝修补术后短期并发症的比较:一项随机试验研究
Minerva Chir. 2015 Apr;70(2):83-9. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
2
A Comparison of Outcomes between Lichtenstein and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia.李金斯坦手术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的疗效比较
Am Surg. 2018 Nov 1;84(11):1774-1780.
3
Outcome and cost comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair versus Open Lichtenstein technique.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放式李金斯坦手术的疗效及成本比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004 Jun;14(3):159-63. doi: 10.1089/1092642041255414.
4
Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与李金斯坦手术治疗原发性腹股沟疝修补术的比较——一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Surg. 2017 May 10;17(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0253-7.
5
A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein repair for bilateral inguinal hernias.一项比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与李金斯坦修补术治疗双侧腹股沟疝的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Surg. 2018 Jul;216(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
6
A prospective, randomized comparison of long-term outcomes: chronic groin pain and quality of life following totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.一项前瞻性、随机对照比较研究:完全腹膜外(TEP)和经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后慢性腹股沟疼痛和生活质量的长期结局。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2373-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2797-7. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
7
Comparison of Lichtenstein and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of recurrent inguinal hernias.李金斯坦手术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的比较
Int Surg. 2011 Jul-Sep;96(3):233-8. doi: 10.9738/cc53.1.
8
Bilateral inguinal hernia repair and male fertility: a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique.双侧腹股沟疝修补术和男性生育能力:一项比较开放式经腹股沟腹膜前修补术(Lichtenstein)与腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前修补术(TAPP)技术的随机临床试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9263-9274. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10499-8. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
9
Self-adhesive mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Experience of a single center.用于李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术的自粘补片。单中心经验。
Minerva Chir. 2014 Jun;69(3):167-76. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
10
[Operative strategy and short-term efficacy of recurrent groin hernia].[复发性腹股沟疝的手术策略及短期疗效]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 25;21(7):761-765.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of open and laparoscopic preperitoneal tension-free repair of groin hernia: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study.腹股沟疝开放与腹腔镜腹膜前无张力修补术的比较:一项前瞻性非随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep;39(9):5889-5898. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11913-z. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
2
Inguinodynia following inguinal hernia repair: a comparative analysis of open Lichtenstein and laparoscopic TAPP techniques in a two-center cohort.腹股沟疝修补术后的腹股沟疼痛:两中心队列中开放式Lichtenstein手术与腹腔镜TAPP手术的比较分析
Front Surg. 2025 May 22;12:1590855. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1590855. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparison of Postoperative Short-term Complications and Recurrence after One Year between Laparoscopic Transabdominal Pre-peritoneal (TAPP) and Lichtenstein Tension Free Repair on the Treatment of Primary Unilateral Inguinal Hernia.
腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与李金斯坦无张力修补术治疗原发性单侧腹股沟疝术后短期并发症及一年后复发情况的比较
World J Plast Surg. 2024;13(3):87-91. doi: 10.61186/wjps.13.3.87.
4
Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair: ten recommendations to optimize surgical outcomes.Lichtenstein 技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术:优化手术效果的 10 项建议。
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1467-1476. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03094-w. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
5
Comparison of modified tumescent and conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective clinical study.改良肿胀技术与传统腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项回顾性临床研究。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Jan;52(1):3000605231220789. doi: 10.1177/03000605231220789.
6
The Lichtenstein technique is being used adequately in inguinal hernia repair: national analysis and review of the surgical technique.Lichtenstein 技术在腹股沟疝修补术中得到充分应用:全国范围内对手术技术的分析和回顾。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2023 Dec 8;50:e20233655. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233655-en. eCollection 2023.
7
Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management.国际疝外科学院腹股沟疝管理指南更新。
BJS Open. 2023 Sep 5;7(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad080.
8
Inguinal Hernia Mesh Repair: The Factors to Consider When Deciding Between Open Versus Laparoscopic Repair.腹股沟疝补片修补术:开放修补与腹腔镜修补抉择时需考虑的因素
Cureus. 2021 Nov 16;13(11):e19628. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19628. eCollection 2021 Nov.
9
Primary unilateral not complicated inguinal hernia: our choice of TAPP, why, results and review of literature.原发性单侧非复杂性腹股沟疝:我们选择 TAPP 的原因、结果和文献复习。
Hernia. 2019 Jun;23(3):417-428. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01959-z. Epub 2019 May 8.
10
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.