Kristoffersen M, Piene H
Kvinneklinikken Baerum sykehus, Oslo.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1997 Jan 30;117(3):361-5.
From 1987, patients waiting for treatment in Norwegian hospitals are given different degrees of priority, from zero to five. As from 1990, patients in priority group two are placed on a special list, and a report is made if they have not been treated within six months. There is a considerable variation in the frequency with which the patients are given this treatment guarantee in the different Norwegians counties. In the case of gynaecological patients the frequency varies from one to 94%, of urological patients from 43 to 100%, of orthopaedic patients from 21 to 89% and of otorhinolaryngological patients from 21 to 89%. The same variations are also seen within a single region of the country, and between departments. The reason for this discrepancy may be varying composition of the population, different extents of day surgery or different economic strategic thinking. Probably the main reason is that the criteria for giving a waiting list guarantee are not accepted as operational. This leads to different medical judgments when evaluating the applications for treatment in hospital.
自1987年起,在挪威医院等待治疗的患者被赋予从0到5不同程度的优先级。自1990年起,二级优先组的患者被列入一个特殊名单,如果他们在六个月内未得到治疗,会形成一份报告。在挪威不同的郡,给予患者这种治疗保障的频率存在相当大的差异。就妇科患者而言,频率从1%到94%不等,泌尿科患者从43%到100%不等,骨科患者从21%到89%不等,耳鼻喉科患者从21%到89%不等。在该国的单个地区以及各科室之间也存在同样的差异。这种差异的原因可能是人口构成不同、日间手术的程度不同或经济战略思维不同。主要原因可能是给予等候名单保障的标准未被视为可操作。这导致在评估住院治疗申请时出现不同的医学判断。