• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[医疗保健中的等候名单保障。一些理论思考]

[Waiting lists guarantee in health care. Some theoretical reflections].

作者信息

Piene H, Hauge H K, Nyen P A

机构信息

Statens helsetilsyn, Oslo.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1997 Jan 30;117(3):370-4.

PMID:9064860
Abstract

In 1990 a "waiting list guarantee" was introduced in the Norwegian health care system to secure treatment within six months for patients belonging to priority group II. (Priority group II are patients in need of treatment to avoid health hazards or serious long-term effects.) This guarantee has been difficult to honour and has caused considerable political unrest in the recent years. In an attempt to reform the guarantee, an analysis of our hospitals' capacity problems has been carried out, based on the general theory of queues. One result was that in order to fulfill the guarantee it is necessary to drastically reduce the queues and increase the capacity to deliver health services. This article presents the reasoning behind the analysis, in order to demonstrate the necessary foundation for a health policy that aims to reduce the time Norwegian patients have to wait for treatment in hospital.

摘要

1990年,挪威医疗保健系统引入了“等候名单保障”措施,以确保第二类优先组患者能在六个月内得到治疗。(第二类优先组是指需要接受治疗以避免健康危害或严重长期影响的患者。)这项保障措施一直难以兑现,近年来引发了相当大的政治动荡。为了改革这项保障措施,基于排队论对我们医院的容量问题进行了分析。结果之一是,为了实现这一保障,有必要大幅减少排队现象并提高提供医疗服务的能力。本文阐述了该分析背后的推理过程,以展示旨在减少挪威患者在医院等待治疗时间的卫生政策的必要基础。

相似文献

1
[Waiting lists guarantee in health care. Some theoretical reflections].[医疗保健中的等候名单保障。一些理论思考]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1997 Jan 30;117(3):370-4.
2
[The waiting list guarantee. Variations in frequency of receiving the waiting list guarantee].[等待名单保障。获得等待名单保障的频率差异]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1997 Jan 30;117(3):361-5.
3
[Waiting list guarantee between medicine and bureaucracy].[医学与官僚作风之间的等待名单保障]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1998 Oct 20;118(25):3921-6.
4
[Reports of waiting list data from hospitals to the central registry--a database for reducing hospital waiting lists. Minimum dataset of waiting list parameters].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1991 Nov 30;111(29):3536-9.
5
[Criteria for waiting list guarantee. An attempt at precision].[等待名单保障标准。精准化尝试]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1997 Jan 30;117(3):358-61.
6
How to report and monitor the performance of waiting list management.如何报告和监测等待名单管理的绩效。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002 Summer;18(3):611-8.
7
Prioritization and patients' rights: analysing the effect of a reform in the Norwegian hospital sector.优先排序和患者权利:分析挪威医院部门改革的效果。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jan;70(2):199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.022. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
8
The unethical focus on access: a study of medical ethics and the waiting-time guarantee.对医疗服务可及性的不道德关注:一项关于医学伦理与等待时间保障的研究
Scand J Public Health. 2009 Mar;37(2):117-21. doi: 10.1177/1403494808101359. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
9
An evaluation of strategies to reduce waiting times for total joint replacement in Ontario.安大略省全关节置换等待时间减少策略的评估。
Med Care. 2008 Nov;46(11):1177-83. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817925e8.
10
[An alternative to current waiting list guarantee].[当前等候名单保障的替代方案]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1997 Jun 10;117(15):2210-3.