Hachisuka K, Ogata H, Ohkuma H, Tanaka S, Dozono K
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Clin Rehabil. 1997 Feb;11(1):28-35. doi: 10.1177/026921559701100105.
To develop a self-rating Barthel Index questionnaire (SB) for assessing stroke patients living at home, the test-retest reliability of SB versions 1 and 2 and the inter-method reliability of SB version 3 were examined.
Case series.
Clinics of the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at the University Hospital and two affiliated hospitals.
Thirty-one, 140 and 65 chronic stroke patients living at home, being seen for regular follow-up, and having no severe aphasia for SB versions 1, 2 and 3, respectively.
Kappa coefficients of items in SB versions 1 and 2 for test-retest reliability, intra-class correlation coefficients of the self-care index, mobility index and total score, kappa coefficients of items and Friedman's two-way ANOVAs of ranking in SB version 3 among the self-ratings, family ratings and occupational therapist (OT) ratings; a regression analysis of age, gender, duration, time for filling in the SB, OT ratings, Mini-Mental State score and aphasia.
Kappa coefficients in SB version 2 were higher than those in version 1. Intra-class correlation coefficients in SB version 3 among the three ratings were good, and kappa coefficients in each item were also good or excellent. By Friedman's two-way ANOVA, all the items except walking up/down stairs had no significant difference in ranking. Regression analysis revealed that OT ratings and time for filling in the SB affected the absolute difference of scores between the self-ratings and OT ratings.
SB version 3 is sufficiently reliable for practical use.