Crews D
Department of Zoology, University of Texas at Austin 78712, USA.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997 Jan 15;807:1-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb51910.x.
One of the first things that we are impressed by is the great variety of animals, particularly their behaviors and their physiologies. With so many differences, are there any generalities? With the establishment of evolutionary theory, evidence of "unity in diversity" comes with discoveries of common anatomical features, the cell cycle, conservation of intermediary metabolism, and the genetic code, to name but a few. In vertebrates there appears to be a conservation of the neural circuits underlying sexual behavior, but it is still too early to state the extent to which this concept can be extended to the hormonal mechanisms underlying behavior. Much of our conceptual understanding of behavioral neuroendocrinology stems from extensive studies on relatively few species. When an evolutionary perspective is applied to behavioral neuroscience, the breadth and validity of our assumptions about the mechanisms that control species-typical behaviors are challenged. This is not the same thing as saying that there are few unitary explanations that apply to all mammals, amniotes, or even vertebrates. Considerable information has been gathered about the neuroendocrine bases of behavior in a few species, but to uncover truly broad generalizations, we must look with equal intensity and rigor at other organisms. The pattern of evolution is best illustrated in the diversity of organisms, and the ecological and evolutionary perspective illuminates the utility of various "experiments of nature." By studying (1) closely related species that live in different habitats, we can see if the adaptational responses are similar, and (2) distantly related species that live in the same habitat, we can see if the solutions are analogous. The unique qualities of each species also give us a deeper understanding of the constraints in fundamental processes. When basic conflicts exist, control mechanisms adapt or the species goes extinct. Interestingly, although the neural circuits themselves do not degenerate, they are either no longer used or coopted for other functions.
首先给我们留下深刻印象的事情之一是动物种类的繁多,尤其是它们的行为和生理特征。存在如此多的差异,是否有共性呢?随着进化理论的建立,“多样性中的统一性”的证据来自于共同解剖特征、细胞周期、中间代谢的保守性以及遗传密码等方面的发现,这里仅列举了几个例子。在脊椎动物中,性行为背后的神经回路似乎具有保守性,但要说明这一概念能在多大程度上扩展到行为背后的激素机制,还为时过早。我们对行为神经内分泌学的许多概念性理解源于对相对较少物种的广泛研究。当将进化视角应用于行为神经科学时,我们关于控制物种典型行为机制的假设的广度和有效性受到了挑战。这与说适用于所有哺乳动物、羊膜动物甚至脊椎动物的统一解释很少不是一回事。已经收集了关于少数物种行为的神经内分泌基础的大量信息,但为了揭示真正广泛的概括,我们必须同样深入和严谨地研究其他生物。进化模式在生物多样性中得到了最好的体现,生态和进化视角阐明了各种“自然实验”的效用。通过研究(1)生活在不同栖息地的近缘物种,我们可以看看适应反应是否相似;(2)生活在同一栖息地的远缘物种,我们可以看看解决方案是否类似。每个物种的独特特性也让我们对基本过程中的限制有更深入的理解。当存在基本冲突时,控制机制会适应,否则物种就会灭绝。有趣的是,尽管神经回路本身不会退化,但它们要么不再被使用,要么被用于其他功能。