• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阻力指数代表的是体部压力,而非海绵体壁阻力。

The resistance index represents the corporeal pressure and not the cavernous wall resistance.

作者信息

de Meyer J M, Thibo P

机构信息

Department of Urology and Internal Medicine, City Hospital De Bijloke, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

J Urol. 1997 Mar;157(3):830-2. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199703000-00022.

DOI:10.1097/00005392-199703000-00022
PMID:9072579
Abstract

PURPOSE

We compare the results of the resistance index generated by duplex scanning and the corporeal pressure generated by the intracavernous injection test followed by gravity cavernosometry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined 40 impotent subjects with duplex scanning and gravity cavernosometry.

RESULTS

For the entire group a significant correlation (r = 0.77, p < 0.001) was found between the resistance index and intracavernous injection test, and between the resistance index and the gravity cavernosometry (r = 0.62, p < 0.01). Excluding the results of patients who had a full erection during scanning, the correlation between the resistance index and intracavernous injection test remained but the correlation between the resistance index and gravity cavernosometry disappeared (r = -0.02, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no relationship between the value of the resistance index and the cavernous wall resistance, except in patients capable of developing a full erection after vasodilator injection.

摘要

目的

我们比较了双功扫描产生的阻力指数结果与海绵体内注射试验后重力海绵体测压法产生的体内压力结果。

材料与方法

我们对40例阳痿患者进行了双功扫描和重力海绵体测压法检查。

结果

对于整个组,在阻力指数与海绵体内注射试验之间,以及阻力指数与重力海绵体测压法之间均发现显著相关性(r = 0.77,p < 0.001)(r = 0.62,p < 0.01)。排除扫描期间完全勃起患者的结果后,阻力指数与海绵体内注射试验之间的相关性仍然存在,但阻力指数与重力海绵体测压法之间的相关性消失(r = -0.02,p > 0.05)。

结论

阻力指数值与海绵体壁阻力之间没有关系,除了在注射血管扩张剂后能够完全勃起的患者中。

相似文献

1
The resistance index represents the corporeal pressure and not the cavernous wall resistance.阻力指数代表的是体部压力,而非海绵体壁阻力。
J Urol. 1997 Mar;157(3):830-2. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199703000-00022.
2
The evaluation of arterial inflow by gravity cavernosometry.通过重力海绵体测压法评估动脉血流。
J Urol. 1997 Aug;158(2):440-3. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199708000-00029.
3
The correlation among cavernous pressure, penile rigidity and resistance index.海绵体压力、阴茎硬度与阻力指数之间的相关性。
J Urol. 1998 Jul;160(1):63-6. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199807000-00025.
4
[Comparative study of duplex Doppler ultrasonography and dynamic cavernosometry by infusion in the diagnosis of arteriogenic impotence].
Actas Urol Esp. 1996 Sep;20(8):709-18; discussion 718-9.
5
Corporeal veno-occlusive dysfunction: predominantly intracavernous muscular pathology.体静脉闭塞功能障碍:主要为海绵体内肌肉病变。
J Urol. 1997 May;157(5):1678-80. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64833-x.
6
Dynamic infusion cavernosometry and cavernosography (DICC) in the evaluation of vasculogenic impotence.动态灌注海绵体测压和海绵体造影术(DICC)在血管性阳痿评估中的应用
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1996 Apr;57(4):266-73.
7
Gravity cavernosometry and assessment of complete smooth muscle relaxation: helpful in the differential diagnosis of cavernous leakage?重力海绵体测压法与完全平滑肌松弛评估:对海绵体漏的鉴别诊断有帮助吗?
Eur Urol. 1998;33(5):441-6. doi: 10.1159/000019633.
8
In vivo assessment of trabecular smooth muscle tone, its application in pharmaco-cavernosometry and analysis of intracavernous pressure determinants.
J Urol. 1995 Apr;153(4):1126-35.
9
The correlation of cavernous systolic occlusion pressure with peak velocity flow using color duplex Doppler ultrasound.
J Urol. 1995 Feb;153(2):358-60. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199502000-00018.
10
Diffuse veno-occlusive dysfunction: the underlying hemodynamic abnormality resulting in failure to respond to intracavernous pharmacotherapy.弥漫性静脉闭塞功能障碍:导致对海绵体内药物治疗无反应的潜在血流动力学异常。
J Urol. 1996 Dec;156(6):1942-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65400-4.