• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国的透析费用。

The costs of dialysis in the USA.

作者信息

Garella S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, St Joseph Health Centers and Hospital, Chicago, IL 60657, USA.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1997;12 Suppl 1:10-21.

PMID:9075223
Abstract

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is unique in that, in the United States, it is the only disease-specific condition covered by Medicare independently of the age of patients. Medical care to these patients is provided through 2506 facilities, most of which are free-standing. Of these, the majority are operated by profit-making concerns. The total number of patients served by the Medicare ESRD programme has increased each year and in 1995 it is estimated to be approximately 260,000, of which 195,000 are treated with maintenance dialysis, largely in-centre haemodialysis. Total expenditures for the ESRD programme (of which Medicare is responsible for approximately 72%) in 1995 are projected at $12.3 billion, of which Medicare is responsible for approximately $8.9 billion. Close to 50% of the expenditures are related to the provision of maintenance dialysis. The major component of these expenses is attributable to the Medicare 'composite' reimbursement fee, a fee the amount of which is established by Medicare to reimburse dialysis units for the provision of maintenance dialysis, independent of the costs that the unit might incur. This 'composite' fee has decreased substantially in the course of the last 20 years. The mortality of patients on dialysis in the USA remains high. This is in part due to the increasing severity of associated illnesses and more advanced age of the patients. However, the dose of delivered dialysis in the USA remains less than that observed in other industrialized countries. Three factors appear to play important roles in keeping the dose of dialysis low: the Medicare reimbursement method, the fiscal pressure on dialysis units to generate revenues, and patient preferences. There is general agreement that an increase in dialysis dose will be necessary to reduce mortality. However, this increase would be accompanied by increased costs to the providers of treatment. Improvements in the dose of dialysis to patients (and hence, it is hoped, in morbidity and mortality) are not likely to occur unless Medicare reimbursement increases and is designed to provide financial inducements to improve care and outcomes.

摘要

终末期肾病(ESRD)在美国具有独特之处,它是医疗保险独立于患者年龄所覆盖的唯一特定疾病状况。为这些患者提供的医疗服务通过2506家机构进行,其中大多数是独立的。在这些机构中,大多数是由盈利性企业运营的。医疗保险ESRD计划所服务的患者总数逐年增加,1995年估计约为26万,其中19.5万接受维持性透析治疗,主要是中心血液透析。1995年ESRD计划的总支出(医疗保险约承担72%)预计为123亿美元,其中医疗保险约承担89亿美元。近50%的支出与维持性透析的提供有关。这些费用的主要部分归因于医疗保险的“综合”报销费用,该费用数额由医疗保险确定,用于向透析单位报销维持性透析的费用,与单位可能产生的成本无关。在过去20年中,这种“综合”费用大幅下降。美国透析患者的死亡率仍然很高。部分原因是相关疾病的严重程度增加以及患者年龄更大。然而,美国提供的透析剂量仍低于其他工业化国家。有三个因素似乎在使透析剂量保持较低方面起着重要作用:医疗保险报销方法、透析单位创收的财政压力以及患者偏好。人们普遍认为,增加透析剂量对于降低死亡率是必要的。然而,这种增加将伴随着治疗提供者成本的增加。除非医疗保险报销增加并旨在提供经济激励以改善护理和治疗结果,否则不太可能提高给患者的透析剂量(从而有望改善发病率和死亡率)。

相似文献

1
The costs of dialysis in the USA.美国的透析费用。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1997;12 Suppl 1:10-21.
2
Impact of reimbursement regulations on patient management.报销规定对患者管理的影响。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1992 Jul;20(1 Suppl 1):8-11.
3
Should the medicare ESRD program pay for daily dialysis? An ethical analysis.医疗保险终末期肾病项目应该为每日透析付费吗?一项伦理分析。
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2007 Jul;14(3):290-6. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2007.03.001.
4
The direction of end-stage renal disease reimbursement in the United States.美国终末期肾病报销的方向。
Semin Dial. 2004 Mar-Apr;17(2):125-30. doi: 10.1111/j.0894-0959.2004.17209.x.
5
The financial implications for Medicare of greater use of peritoneal dialysis.更多使用腹膜透析对医疗保险的财务影响。
Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):880-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.004.
6
A quarter century of medicare expenditures for ESRD.25年来医疗保险用于终末期肾病的支出。
Semin Nephrol. 2000 Nov;20(6):516-22.
7
Epidemiology of end stage renal disease and implications for public policy.终末期肾病的流行病学及其对公共政策的影响。
Public Health Rep. 1984 Sep-Oct;99(5):492-8.
8
Morbidity and cost implications of inadequate hemodialysis.血液透析不充分的发病率及成本影响
Am J Kidney Dis. 2001 Jun;37(6):1223-31. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.24526.
9
Increasing the use of arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis: economic benefits and economic barriers.增加动静脉内瘘在血液透析中的使用:经济效益与经济障碍。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Mar;2(2):268-76. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01880606. Epub 2007 Jan 24.
10
Projected impact of the proposed "bundled" ESRD payment system on a small dialysis organization.拟议的“捆绑式”终末期肾病支付系统对一家小型透析机构的预期影响。
Nephrol News Issues. 2009 Jun;23(7):46, 48-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Agreement Between Administrative Database and Medical Chart Review for the Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease G category.行政数据库与病历审查在慢性肾脏病G类别预测方面的一致性
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 Oct 10;7:2054358120959908. doi: 10.1177/2054358120959908. eCollection 2020.
2
Economic evaluation of dialysis therapies.透析疗法的经济学评价。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014 Nov;10(11):644-52. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2014.145. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
3
Alternative strategies to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.
评估腹膜透析和血液透析成本效益的替代策略。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39(1):289-98. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-9141-2. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
4
Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator infusion for hemodialysis catheter clearance.重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂输注用于血液透析导管通畅治疗
Pediatr Nephrol. 2005 Jul;20(7):989-93. doi: 10.1007/s00467-004-1797-1. Epub 2005 Apr 21.
5
Prevention of renal failure: the Malaysian experience.肾衰竭的预防:马来西亚的经验
Kidney Int Suppl. 2005 Apr;67(94):S70-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.09418.x.
6
Longitudinal analysis of efficiency in multiple output dialysis markets.多产出透析市场效率的纵向分析。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2004 Nov;7(4):253-61. doi: 10.1007/s10729-004-7534-2.