Piepsz A, Ham H R
Hôpital Saint Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Nucl Med Commun. 1997 Feb;18(2):139-41. doi: 10.1097/00006231-199702000-00008.
The aim of this study was to test the reproducibility of the second exponential of the plasma disappearance curve of 51Cr-EDTA and to compare it with the single slope-intercept method. The test was performed twice among 24 young healthy volunteers at an interval of 8 days and under similar physiological conditions. After the intravenous injection of 3.7 MBq of 51Cr-EDTA, four blood samples were taken between 1.5 and 4 h and combinations of two, three or all four of these were used to calculate the slope of the plasma clearance curve. The clearances rates were calculated using these slopes and the corresponding intercepts of the slopes with the y-axis. The standard deviation of the differences between the first and the second measurements was between 8 and 10% for the different clearance estimates, and between 11 and 17% for the different slope estimates, reflecting the wider variability of the slope estimate. Using the first series of measurements, the change of timing for blood sampling introduced a wider variability for the slope estimate than for the clearance estimate.
本研究的目的是测试51Cr-EDTA血浆消失曲线的第二个指数的可重复性,并将其与单斜率截距法进行比较。该测试在24名年轻健康志愿者中进行了两次,间隔8天,且处于相似的生理条件下。静脉注射3.7 MBq的51Cr-EDTA后,在1.5至4小时内采集4份血样,并使用其中两份、三份或全部四份血样的组合来计算血浆清除曲线的斜率。利用这些斜率和斜率与y轴的相应截距计算清除率。对于不同的清除率估计,第一次和第二次测量之间差异的标准差在8%至10%之间,对于不同的斜率估计,标准差在11%至17%之间,这反映了斜率估计的变异性更大。使用第一组测量数据时,采血时间的变化对斜率估计产生的变异性比对清除率估计产生的变异性更大。