Suppr超能文献

谷物来源和谷物加工对育肥牛性能的影响:综述

The effect of grain source and grain processing on performance of feedlot cattle: a review.

作者信息

Owens F N, Secrist D S, Hill W J, Gill D R

机构信息

Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Animal Science Department, Stillwater 74078, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 1997 Mar;75(3):868-79. doi: 10.2527/1997.753868x.

Abstract

Effects of grain species and grain processing method on DMI, rate and efficiency of gain, and feeding value for cattle fed high concentrate diets were appraised by statistically compiling results from 605 comparisons from feeding trials published in North American journals and experiment station bulletins since 1974. Metabolizable energy (ME) values for each grain and processing method were calculated by quadratic procedures from DMI and animal performance. Averaged across processing methods, ME values for corn, milo, and wheat grain (3.40, 3.22, and 3.46 Mcal/kg DM) fell within 9% of ME estimates from NRC (1996) for beef cattle. In contrast, ME values for barley and oats grain (3.55 and 3.46 Mcal/kg DM) were 24% and 17% greater than NRC (1996) estimates. Compared with the dry rolled forms, high moisture corn and milo resulted in lower ADG and DMI. Compared with dry rolling, either steam rolling or flaking of corn, milo, and wheat decreased DMI without decreasing ADG and improved feed efficiency by 10, 15, and 10%, respectively. Compared with dry rolled grain, steam flaking increased (P < .05) body weight-adjusted ME of corn and milo grain by 15 and 21%, respectively; body weight-adjusted ME for whole corn was 9% greater (P < .05) than for rolled corn grain. Steam flaking was surprisingly effective (13%) at increasing (P < .05) the body weight-adjusted ME of wheat, but steam flaking failed to increase the ME of barley and oats. Higher moisture content of high-moisture corn decreased dry matter intake without depressing ADG and improved efficiency and increased ME of the grain. Compared with steam flakes of moderate thinness, processing milo or barley to a very thin flake tended to reduce ADG and failed to improve feed efficiency. The ideal roughage source and roughage moisture content for maximum ME and ADG varied with grain processing method. Feeding corn silage rather than alfalfa and wet rather than dry roughage depressed (P < .01) ADG of cattle and reduced (P < .01) body weight-adjusted ME of cattle fed high-moisture corn grain but tended to increase both with steam-flaked corn or wheat.

摘要

通过对自1974年以来发表在北美期刊和试验站公告上的饲养试验中的605次比较结果进行统计汇编,评估了谷物种类和谷物加工方法对采食高浓缩日粮的牛的干物质采食量(DMI)、增重速度和效率以及饲料价值的影响。根据DMI和动物生产性能,通过二次程序计算每种谷物和加工方法的代谢能(ME)值。在各种加工方法中,玉米、高粱和小麦谷物的ME值(分别为3.40、3.22和3.46兆卡/千克干物质)与美国国家研究委员会(NRC,1996)对肉牛的ME估计值相差在9%以内。相比之下,大麦和燕麦谷物的ME值(分别为3.55和3.46兆卡/千克干物质)比NRC(1996)的估计值分别高24%和17%。与干碾压形式相比,高水分玉米和高粱导致日增重(ADG)和DMI较低。与干碾压相比,玉米、高粱和小麦的蒸汽碾压或压片处理分别使DMI降低,且不降低ADG,同时饲料效率分别提高了10%、15%和10%。与干碾压谷物相比,蒸汽压片分别使玉米和高粱谷物的体重校正ME提高了15%和21%(P < 0.05);整粒玉米的体重校正ME比碾压玉米谷物高9%(P < 0.05)。蒸汽压片在提高(P < 0.05)小麦的体重校正ME方面出人意料地有效(提高了13%),但未能提高大麦和燕麦的ME。高水分玉米的较高水分含量降低了干物质摄入量,但未降低ADG,提高了谷物的效率并增加了ME。与中等薄度的蒸汽压片相比,将高粱或大麦加工成非常薄的薄片往往会降低ADG,且未能提高饲料效率。实现最大ME和ADG的理想粗饲料来源和粗饲料水分含量因谷物加工方法而异。饲喂玉米青贮料而非苜蓿,以及湿粗饲料而非干粗饲料,会降低(P < 0.01)采食高水分玉米谷物的牛的ADG,并降低(P < 0.01)其体重校正ME,但对于饲喂蒸汽压片玉米或小麦的牛,这两种情况往往都会增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验