Liesnard C, Delforge M L, Tchetcheroff M, De Maertelaer V, Farber C M, Van Vooren J P
Laboratoire de Référence SIDA, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
J Virol Methods. 1997 Mar;64(2):137-45. doi: 10.1016/s0166-0934(96)02152-0.
The in vitro syncytium induction capacity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV1) isolates is an important marker in the progression of the disease. Two methods have been widely used to determine the biological phenotype of HIV1. These two methods, the direct MT-2 assay and the supernatant assay, were compared for the detection of syncytium-inducing (SI) variants on 275 blood samples obtained from 87 HIV infected patients during a 13 month follow-up period. A SI virus was detected in 152 blood samples. In 44 blood samples, the HIV isolate was found to be SI by only one method, but was SI by both methods in another blood sample of the follow up. Among SI carriers discordant results between the methods were more frequent when the patient was on antiretroviral therapy, and a transient reversion to a non syncytium-inducing (NSI) strain confirmed by both assays was sometimes observed. The supernatant assay has a 93% sensitivity and the direct MT-2 assay has a 78% sensitivity for detection of the SI phenotype. The supernatant assay is as rapid as and less tedious than the MT-2 assay. Antiretroviral therapy could have some effects in decreasing or even suppressing the SI part of the virus population of patients with SI phenotype.
人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)分离株的体外合胞体诱导能力是疾病进展的一个重要标志。有两种方法被广泛用于确定HIV-1的生物学表型。在13个月的随访期间,对从87名HIV感染患者获取的275份血样,比较了这两种方法(直接MT-2检测法和上清液检测法)检测合胞体诱导(SI)变异株的情况。在152份血样中检测到了SI病毒。在44份血样中,仅通过一种方法发现HIV分离株为SI,但在随访的另一份血样中两种方法均检测到为SI。在接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的患者中,两种方法结果不一致的情况在SI携带者中更为常见,并且有时会观察到两种检测均证实的向非合胞体诱导(NSI)毒株的短暂逆转。上清液检测法检测SI表型的灵敏度为93%,直接MT-2检测法的灵敏度为78%。上清液检测法与MT-2检测法一样快速,且操作更简便。抗逆转录病毒治疗可能对降低甚至抑制具有SI表型患者的病毒群体中SI部分有一定作用。