Revanna P, Fisher J, Watterson K G
Killingbeck Hospital, University of Leeds, UK.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997 Feb;11(2):280-6. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(96)01045-7.
There is increasing interest in the use of stentless porcine bioprostheses implanted by the free hand suturing technique. However, preservation of the normal valve geometry and function is a matter of concern. This study has been conducted to investigate the influence of free hand insertion on the hydrodynamic function of the aortic valve. In particular, free sewn valves have been compared to whole root replacements for both fresh valves and zero pressure fixed bioprostheses.
Four sets of porcine aortic roots with six aortic roots in each set consisting of (A) fresh aortic roots, (B) fresh aortic valve inserted by free hand suturing technique in fresh aortic valve fixed in glutaraldehyde under zero pressure, inserted by free hand suturing technique in fresh aortic roots, and (D) aortic roots fixed in glutaraldehyde under zero pressure, were studied. Hydrodynamic function and leaflet bending deformations were analysed in a modified pulsatile flow simulator which incorporates the elastic aortic roots.
The glutaraldehyde-treated roots were found to be less distensible than the fresh aortic roots, with a mean dilatation of only 8% compared with 43% for the fresh roots at 120 mmHg pressure. The other two groups of free sewn valves showed reasonably good dilatation of 38%. There was no significant difference between the two sets. The hydraulic effective orifice area (EOA) of the valve, which was derived from the flow and pressure measurements, was divided by the actual orifice area for the annulus to arrive at the performance index. The performance index for glutaraldehyde-fixed aortic root was the lowest, with an index of 0.47 compared with 0.91 for that of fresh roots, 0.61 for the fresh valve in fresh root and 0.50 for the glutaraldehyde-treated valve in fresh root. The mean pressure difference during the peak flow also associated the same order with 12 mmHg for the glutaraldehyde-fixed roots, 1.8 mmHg for the fresh roots, 5.3 mmHg for the fresh valve in fresh root and 7.7 mmHg for the glutaraldehyde-treated valve in fresh root. The free hand suturing technique altered the leaflet geometry and caused increased open leaflet bending deformations compared to the fresh root. Both groups of free sewn valves behaved better than the zero pressure fixed root.
Alteration in leaflet biomechanics is likely to influence long-term valve durability.
人们对采用徒手缝合技术植入的无支架猪生物瓣膜的兴趣日益增加。然而,正常瓣膜几何形状和功能的保留是一个值得关注的问题。本研究旨在探讨徒手植入对主动脉瓣流体动力学功能的影响。特别是,将徒手缝合的瓣膜与新鲜瓣膜和零压力固定生物瓣膜的全根部置换进行了比较。
研究了四组猪主动脉根部,每组六个主动脉根部,包括(A)新鲜主动脉根部,(B)在零压力下固定于戊二醛中的新鲜主动脉瓣中通过徒手缝合技术插入的新鲜主动脉瓣,(C)在新鲜主动脉根部中通过徒手缝合技术插入的新鲜主动脉瓣,以及(D)在零压力下固定于戊二醛中的主动脉根部。在一个结合了弹性主动脉根部的改良脉动流模拟器中分析流体动力学功能和瓣叶弯曲变形。
发现经戊二醛处理的根部比新鲜主动脉根部的扩张性小,在120 mmHg压力下,平均扩张率仅为8%,而新鲜根部为43%。另外两组徒手缝合的瓣膜显示出相当好的38%的扩张率。两组之间没有显著差异。通过流量和压力测量得出的瓣膜水力有效开口面积(EOA)除以瓣环的实际开口面积以得出性能指标。戊二醛固定主动脉根部的性能指标最低,指数为0.47,而新鲜根部为0.91,新鲜根部中的新鲜瓣膜为0.61,新鲜根部中经戊二醛处理的瓣膜为0.50。峰值流量期间的平均压差也呈现相同顺序,戊二醛固定根部为12 mmHg,新鲜根部为1.8 mmHg,新鲜根部中的新鲜瓣膜为5.3 mmHg,新鲜根部中经戊二醛处理的瓣膜为7.7 mmHg。与新鲜根部相比,徒手缝合技术改变了瓣叶几何形状并导致开放瓣叶弯曲变形增加。两组徒手缝合的瓣膜表现均优于零压力固定根部。
瓣叶生物力学的改变可能会影响瓣膜的长期耐久性。