Caravello J W, Chauhan S P, Morrison J C, Magann E F, Martin J N, Devoe L D
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912-3350, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):529-33. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00010-0.
To assess the accuracy of estimating birth weight among twins with discordancy (intra-pair difference in actual birth weight of more than 25%) and to determine the relative accuracy of an intra-pair difference in abdominal circumference (delta AC) of 20 mm or more or in estimated fetal weight (delta EFW) of 25% or more for the identification of discordant growth in twins.
Over a 6-year period, we identified all non-anomalous twin pairs with gestational ages greater than 23 weeks and sonographic examinations within 3 weeks of birth. Ultrasonographic biometry of both twins included AC, head circumference, and femur length; these indices were used to estimate fetal weight by Hadlock's formula. Likelihood ratios, receiver-operating characteristic curves, and prediction limits were applied to assess the accuracy of the two diagnostic methods to predict an abnormal outcome.
A total of 242 twin pairs were studied. The mean gestational age among the 21 twins with abnormal growth (30.6 +/- 4.6 weeks) was significantly less than among the 221 twins with normal growth (33.2 +/- 4.0 weeks) (P < .005). The biometric measurements of fetal parts, sonographic estimate of fetal weight, and actual birth weight for both fetuses were significantly less for discordant twin pairs (P < .05). The accuracy of predicting birth weight, as determined by mean error and percentage of the estimate within 10% of the actual weight, was similar between the groups. Receiver-operating characteristic curves showed that both diagnostic tests yielded areas under the two curves not significantly different from the area under the nondiagnostic line (P > .05). Most important, prediction limit calculations indicated that a 90% certainty that the actual birth weight discordance was at least 25% was achievable only if delta AC was 172 mm or greater or delta EFW was 112% or more.
The most popular current methods (difference in AC or EFW) for predicting discordant growth in twin gestations have limited accuracy when held to a standard for discordance that requires a birth weight difference of at least 25%.
评估对体重不一致(双胎实际出生体重的配对差异超过25%)的双胎进行出生体重估计的准确性,并确定腹围配对差异(ΔAC)达20 mm或更大或估计胎儿体重配对差异(ΔEFW)达25%或更大用于识别双胎生长不一致的相对准确性。
在6年期间,我们识别出所有孕龄大于23周且在出生后3周内接受超声检查的非异常双胎。对两个胎儿均进行超声生物测量,包括腹围、头围和股骨长度;这些指标用于通过Hadlock公式估计胎儿体重。应用似然比、受试者操作特征曲线和预测界限来评估两种诊断方法预测异常结局的准确性。
共研究了242对双胎。21例生长异常双胎的平均孕龄(30.6±4.6周)显著低于221例生长正常双胎的平均孕龄(33.2±4.0周)(P<.005)。不一致双胎对中两个胎儿的胎儿各部分生物测量值、胎儿体重超声估计值和实际出生体重均显著较低(P<.05)。通过平均误差和估计值在实际体重的10%范围内的百分比确定的预测出生体重的准确性在两组之间相似。受试者操作特征曲线显示,两种诊断试验得出的曲线下面积与非诊断线的曲线下面积无显著差异(P>.05)。最重要的是,预测界限计算表明,只有当ΔAC为172 mm或更大或ΔEFW为112%或更高时,才能有90%的把握确定实际出生体重差异至少为25%。
对于双胎妊娠生长不一致的预测,当按照出生体重差异至少为25%的不一致标准衡量时,目前最常用的方法(AC或EFW差异)准确性有限。