• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

曝光时间对使用迪高拉系统进行体外龋齿诊断的影响。

Effect of exposure time on in vitro caries diagnosis using the Digora system.

作者信息

Huysmans M C, Hintze H, Wenzel A

机构信息

TRIKON: Institute for Dental Clinical Research, Department of Cariology and Endodontology, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Oral Sci. 1997 Feb;105(1):15-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00175.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00175.x
PMID:9085024
Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the in vitro diagnostic performance for approximal caries and occlusal dentine caries diagnosis of the Digora system for digital radiography in relation to the exposure time. Radiographs were made of 220 extracted human posterior teeth and cuspids at exposure time levels of 3%, 6%, 10%, 20%, and 78% of the exposure time needed for E-speed film (image sets I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively). The image sets were put in random order (III, I, IV, II, V) and assessed independently by 3 observers using a 5-point confidence scale. True caries status was determined histologically after sectioning of the teeth. Evaluated parameters were: interexaminer kappa, sensitivity, specificity, Dz3/4 (the distance of one operating point to the diagonal in the ROC domain) and area under the ROC curve. The Spearman correlation coefficients between the parameters and both exposure time and order of viewing of the sets were calculated. For approximal surfaces, the ranges of mean parameter values were: sensitivity 26-33%, specificity 93-95%, Dz3/4 0.63-0.84, area 0.61-0.69. For occlusal surfaces, the ranges were: sensitivity 52-60%, specificity 91-95%, Dz3/4 1.03-1.34, area 0.79-0.87. Out of 24 pairwise comparisons between sets V and I, 5 were significant. Out of 24 comparisons between set V and II, only 2 were significant. It was concluded that diagnostic performance is unlikely to be impaired for an exposure time as short as 6% of E-speed film exposure. When reducing the exposure time to 3% of E-speed film exposure, caries diagnosis may be impaired.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定Digora数字射线摄影系统在不同曝光时间下对邻面龋和咬合面牙本质龋的体外诊断性能。对220颗拔除的人类后牙和尖牙进行射线摄影,曝光时间分别为E速胶片所需曝光时间的3%、6%、10%、20%和78%(分别为图像集I、II、III、IV和V)。图像集按随机顺序排列(III、I、IV、II、V),由3名观察者使用5分置信度量表独立评估。牙齿切片后通过组织学确定真实龋病状态。评估参数包括:检查者间kappa值、敏感性、特异性、Dz3/4(ROC域中一个操作点到对角线的距离)和ROC曲线下面积。计算参数与曝光时间和图像集观看顺序之间的Spearman相关系数。对于邻面,平均参数值范围为:敏感性26 - 33%,特异性93 - 95%,Dz3/4 0.63 - 0.84,面积0.61 - 0.69。对于咬合面,范围为:敏感性52 - 60%,特异性91 - 95%,Dz3/­4 1.03 - 1.34,面积0.79 - 0.87。在图像集V和I之间的24对比较中,有5对具有显著性差异。在图像集V和II之间的24次比较中,只有2次具有显著性差异。研究得出结论,对于低至E速胶片曝光时间6%的曝光,诊断性能不太可能受到损害。当将曝光时间减少到E速胶片曝光时间的3%时,龋病诊断可能会受到损害。

相似文献

1
Effect of exposure time on in vitro caries diagnosis using the Digora system.曝光时间对使用迪高拉系统进行体外龋齿诊断的影响。
Eur J Oral Sci. 1997 Feb;105(1):15-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00175.x.
2
Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.四种存储磷光体系统和E速X线片龋齿检测的准确性
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002 May;31(3):170-5. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600686.
3
In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.D速和E速胶片X线摄影、RVG及Visualix数字X线摄影用于检测釉质邻面和牙本质咬合面龋损的体外比较
Caries Res. 1994;28(5):363-7. doi: 10.1159/000262002.
4
Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.使用存储磷光体与胶片射线照相术进行邻面龋深度评估。龋病特异性奥斯陆增强程序的评价。
Caries Res. 2000 Nov-Dec;34(6):448-53. doi: 10.1159/000016622.
5
An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis.使用互补金属氧化物半导体(CMOS)探测器对柯达Insight和爱克发Ektaspeed Plus胶片用于天然近端龋的体外评估:接受者操作特征(ROC)分析。
Caries Res. 2001 Sep-Oct;35(5):354-9. doi: 10.1159/000047474.
6
Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.瑞典和中国高年级牙科学生使用传统胶片和数字X线片检测邻面龋的诊断性能比较。
Swed Dent J. 2013;37(2):79-85.
7
Accuracy of computer-automated caries detection in digital radiographs compared with human observers.与人类观察者相比,数字X线片中计算机自动龋齿检测的准确性。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2002 Jun;110(3):199-203. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.21245.x.
8
Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.与隧道修复相关的残余龋损的影像学检测准确性
Caries Res. 1998;32(1):17-22. doi: 10.1159/000016425.
9
Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.验证方法对龋齿诊断准确性的影响。六种数字射线照相系统与两种传统射线照相系统的比较。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002 Jan;31(1):44-9. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600645.
10
Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.显示图像大小对邻面龋X线片检测的影响。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003 Jul;32(4):242-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/17654484.

引用本文的文献

1
Imaging modalities to inform the detection and diagnosis of early caries.影像学方法在龋齿早期检测和诊断中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 15;3(3):CD014545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014545.
2
Determination of optimum exposure parameters for dentoalveolar structures of the jaws using the CB MercuRay system with cluster signal-to-noise analysis.使用具有簇信号噪声分析的 CB MercuRay 系统确定颌骨的牙牙槽结构的最佳曝光参数。
Oral Radiol. 2019 Sep;35(3):260-271. doi: 10.1007/s11282-018-0348-6. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
3
The usage of digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography among Turkish dentists.
土耳其牙医中数字射线摄影和锥形束计算机断层扫描的使用情况。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Sep;40(6):379-84. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/27837552.