• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

技术团队评估流程的评分者间信度

Interrater reliability of the Technology Team Assessment Process.

作者信息

Embleton A J, Spencer K C

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Am J Occup Ther. 1997 Apr;51(4):297-302. doi: 10.5014/ajot.51.4.297.

DOI:10.5014/ajot.51.4.297
PMID:9085728
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the interrater reliability of the Technology Team Assessment Process (TTAP).

METHOD

Students ages 9 to 12 years who have learning disabilities received a TTAP assessment, which was videotaped. Five independent raters trained in the assessment process observed the videotapes and rated each student with the TTAP recording forms. Additionally, each rater made specific assistive technology recommendations on the basis of his or her evaluation.

RESULTS

Intraclass correlation coefficients revealed that only one of four sections of the TTAP investigated had low to moderate interrater reliability for the students evaluated

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that the TTAP, in its present form, cannot be used with confidence to assess students with learning disabilities and requires more extensive development and testing.

摘要

目的

本研究检验了技术团队评估流程(TTAP)的评分者间信度。

方法

对9至12岁有学习障碍的学生进行TTAP评估,并录制视频。五名接受过评估流程培训的独立评分者观看视频,并使用TTAP记录表格对每名学生进行评分。此外,每位评分者根据自己的评估给出具体的辅助技术建议。

结果

组内相关系数显示,在所调查的TTAP四个部分中,只有一个部分对所评估学生的评分者间信度为低到中度。

结论

本研究结果表明,目前形式的TTAP不能可靠地用于评估有学习障碍的学生,需要更广泛的开发和测试。

相似文献

1
Interrater reliability of the Technology Team Assessment Process.技术团队评估流程的评分者间信度
Am J Occup Ther. 1997 Apr;51(4):297-302. doi: 10.5014/ajot.51.4.297.
2
Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities.多重残疾儿童使用辅助技术的障碍。
Occup Ther Int. 2004;11(4):229-43. doi: 10.1002/oti.213.
3
Addressing assistive technology needs in special education.满足特殊教育中的辅助技术需求。
Am J Occup Ther. 1993 Nov;47(11):993-7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.47.11.993.
4
Educating consumers about assistive technology.向消费者普及辅助技术知识。
Am J Occup Ther. 1993 Nov;47(11):1046-7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.47.11.1046.
5
The promise of assistive technology.辅助技术的前景。
Am J Occup Ther. 1993 Nov;47(11):965-7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.47.11.965.
6
Interrater reliability of Algo used by non-occupational therapist members of homecare interdisciplinary teams.家庭护理跨学科团队中非职业治疗师成员所使用算法的评分者间信度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 May;39(9):883-888. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1168488. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
7
Assistive technology within occupational therapy practice (2004).职业治疗实践中的辅助技术(2004年)
Am J Occup Ther. 2004 Nov-Dec;58(6):678-80. doi: 10.5014/ajot.58.6.678.
8
What's the outcome? Multiple variables complicate the measurement of assistive technology outcomes.结果如何?多个变量使辅助技术结果的衡量变得复杂。
Rehab Manag. 1996 Feb-Mar;9(2):97-9.
9
Role of Occupational Therapy Practitioners in Mass Market Technology Research and Development.职业治疗从业者在大众市场技术研发中的作用。
Am J Occup Ther. 2019 Jan/Feb;73(1):7301347010p1-7301347010p6. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2019.028167.
10
Associations among occupational roles, independence, assistive technology, and purchasing power of individuals with physical disabilities.身体残疾者的职业角色、独立性、辅助技术和购买力之间的关联。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2013 Mar-Apr;21(2):484-91. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692013000200003.