Thase M E, Buysse D J, Frank E, Cherry C R, Cornes C L, Mallinger A G, Kupfer D J
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Apr;154(4):502-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.4.502.
The authors tested the hypothesis that patients whose episodes of major depression evidenced more neurobiological disturbance would be less responsive to psychotherapy.
The study subjects were outpatients who were given a diagnosis of recurrent major depressive disorder (unipolar or bipolar II), according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria, following an interview with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. They were classified into a group with normal sleep profiles (N = 50) and a group with abnormal sleep profiles (N = 41) on the basis of a validated index score derived from three EEG sleep variables monitored for 2 nights: sleep efficiency, REM latency, and REM density. The groups' responses to short-term interpersonal psychotherapy were compared by means of chi-square tests and life table and random effects model analyses. Responses to the addition of pharmacotherapy for subjects who did not respond to interpersonal psychotherapy were also compared.
The patients with abnormal sleep profiles had significantly poorer clinical outcomes with respect to symptom ratings, attrition rates, and remission rates than the patients with more normal sleep profiles. Seventy-five percent of the patients who did not respond to interpersonal psychotherapy had remissions during subsequent pharmacotherapy.
These findings help to define further a neurobiological "boundary" that may limit response to psychotherapy in depression. An abnormal sleep profile may reflect a more marked disturbance of CNS arousal that warrants pharmacotherapy.
作者检验了以下假设,即重度抑郁发作显示出更多神经生物学紊乱的患者对心理治疗的反应较差。
研究对象为门诊患者,根据研究诊断标准,在接受情感障碍和精神分裂症访谈表访谈后,被诊断为复发性重度抑郁症(单相或双相II型)。根据从连续两晚监测的三个脑电图睡眠变量得出的有效指数评分,将他们分为睡眠状况正常组(N = 50)和睡眠状况异常组(N = 41):睡眠效率、快速眼动睡眠潜伏期和快速眼动睡眠密度。通过卡方检验、生命表和随机效应模型分析比较两组对短期人际心理治疗的反应。还比较了对人际心理治疗无反应的受试者加用药物治疗后的反应。
与睡眠状况较正常的患者相比,睡眠状况异常的患者在症状评分、脱落率和缓解率方面的临床结局明显较差。75%对人际心理治疗无反应的患者在随后的药物治疗期间病情缓解。
这些发现有助于进一步界定一个神经生物学“边界”,该边界可能会限制抑郁症患者对心理治疗的反应。异常的睡眠状况可能反映出中枢神经系统觉醒的更明显紊乱,这需要药物治疗。