Suppr超能文献

钝性主动脉损伤的前瞻性研究:美国创伤外科协会多中心试验

Prospective study of blunt aortic injury: Multicenter Trial of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

作者信息

Fabian T C, Richardson J D, Croce M A, Smith J S, Rodman G, Kearney P A, Flynn W, Ney A L, Cone J B, Luchette F A, Wisner D H, Scholten D J, Beaver B L, Conn A K, Coscia R, Hoyt D B, Morris J A, Harviel J D, Peitzman A B, Bynoe R P, Diamond D L, Wall M, Gates J D, Asensio J A, Enderson B L

机构信息

University of Tennessee, Memphis, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1997 Mar;42(3):374-80; discussion 380-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199703000-00003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blunt aortic injury is a major cause of death from blunt trauma. Evolution of diagnostic techniques and methods of operative repair have altered the management and posed new questions in recent years.

METHODS

This study was a prospectively conducted multi-center trial involving 50 trauma centers in North America under the direction of the Multi-institutional Trial Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

RESULTS

There were 274 blunt aortic injury cases studied over 2.5 years, of which 81% were caused by automobile crashes. Chest computed tomography and transesophageal echocardiography were applied in 88 and 30 cases, respectively, and were 75 and 80% diagnostic, respectively. Two hundred seven stable patients underwent planned thoracotomy and repair. Clamp and sew technique was used in 73 (35%) and bypass techniques in 134 (65%). Overall mortality was 31%, with 63% of deaths being attributable to aortic rupture; mortality was not affected by method of repair. Paraplegia occurred postoperatively in 8.7%. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated clamp and sew (p = 0.002) and aortic cross clamp time of > or = 30 minutes (p = 0.01) to be associated with development of postoperative paraplegia.

CONCLUSIONS

Rupture after hospital admission remains a major problem. Although newer diagnostic techniques are being applied, at this time aortography remains the diagnostic standard. Aortic cross clamp time beyond 30 minutes was associated with paraplegia; bypass techniques, which provide distal aortic perfusion, produced significantly lower paraplegia rates than the clamp and sew approach.

摘要

背景

钝性主动脉损伤是钝性创伤致死的主要原因。近年来,诊断技术和手术修复方法的发展改变了治疗方式,并引发了新的问题。

方法

本研究是一项前瞻性多中心试验,由美国创伤外科协会多机构试验委员会指导,涉及北美50个创伤中心。

结果

在2.5年的时间里共研究了274例钝性主动脉损伤病例,其中81%由汽车碰撞所致。分别有88例和30例应用了胸部计算机断层扫描和经食管超声心动图,诊断率分别为75%和80%。207例病情稳定的患者接受了计划性开胸手术和修复。73例(35%)采用了钳夹缝合技术,134例(65%)采用了旁路技术。总体死亡率为31%,63%的死亡归因于主动脉破裂;死亡率不受修复方法的影响。术后截瘫发生率为8.7%。逻辑回归分析显示,钳夹缝合(p = 0.002)和主动脉阻断时间≥30分钟(p = 0.01)与术后截瘫的发生相关。

结论

入院后破裂仍然是一个主要问题。尽管正在应用更新的诊断技术,但目前血管造影仍是诊断标准。主动脉阻断时间超过30分钟与截瘫相关;提供主动脉远端灌注的旁路技术产生的截瘫率明显低于钳夹缝合方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验