Rosewarne R, Bruce A, McKenna M
Department of Psychological Medicine, Monash University, Australia.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1997 Feb;12(2):173-82. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199702)12:2<173::aid-gps591>3.0.co;2-s.
To examine the effectiveness of dementia programmes and report factors related to programme outcomes. To describe the characteristics which placed hostel residents at risk for nursing home placement and to measure changes in dependencies and impairments over 2 years.
Longitudinal, quasi-experimental using in situ resident groups matched on resident and facility characteristics.
Australian hostels for the elderly.
587 residents (programme group N = 184, comparison group N = 162, frail groups N = 241).
Mini-Mental State Examination, Geriatric Depression Scale and staff-rated indices of functioning, including activities of daily living, problem behaviours, psychiatric symptomology and health status, were used to monitor changes in resident characteristics. Time to nursing home placement was another outcome measure.
Residents in hostel dementia programmes remained significantly longer than those in the comparison group (2.5 months over 2 years) before exit to a nursing home. Quality of life for residents in dementia programmes was enhanced through higher levels of social contact with relatives and lower reported levels of depressive symptoms.
Dementia programmes worked, but the reasons why were more difficult to establish. The programmes did not appear to modify the capacities of residents by slowing rates of decline. Dementia programmes provided specialist (non-personal care) staff focusing on the social and emotional needs of residents. These staff provided appropriate, targeted activities for residents with dementia, had a clearly defined role directed exclusively to these residents and felt directly responsible for them. Dementia programmes produced a system effect. They increased the capacity of hostels to care for residents with dementia for longer periods, before admission to a nursing home.
研究痴呆症项目的有效性,并报告与项目成果相关的因素。描述使宿舍居民面临入住养老院风险的特征,并测量两年内依赖性和损伤的变化。
纵向、准实验性研究,采用在居民和设施特征方面相匹配的现场居民群体。
澳大利亚老年宿舍。
587名居民(项目组N = 184,对照组N = 162,体弱组N = 241)。
使用简易精神状态检查表、老年抑郁量表以及工作人员评定的功能指标,包括日常生活活动、问题行为、精神症状和健康状况,来监测居民特征的变化。入住养老院的时间是另一项结果指标。
与对照组相比,宿舍痴呆症项目中的居民在转至养老院之前停留的时间显著更长(两年内多2.5个月)。痴呆症项目中居民的生活质量通过与亲属更高水平的社交接触以及报告的较低抑郁症状水平得到了提高。
痴呆症项目有效,但原因更难确定。这些项目似乎并未通过减缓衰退速度来改善居民的能力。痴呆症项目配备了专注于居民社交和情感需求的专业(非个人护理)工作人员。这些工作人员为患有痴呆症的居民提供了适当的、有针对性的活动,有着专门针对这些居民的明确角色,并对他们直接负责。痴呆症项目产生了一种系统效应。它们提高了宿舍在居民入住养老院之前更长时间照顾患有痴呆症居民的能力。