Cardenas V A, Gill P, Fein G
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Biol Psychiatry. 1997 Apr 15;41(8):891-901. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(96)00186-2.
The amplitude and suppression of the auditory P50 event-related potential may be useful for studying schizophrenia and drug abuse; however, the low reliability of the P50 suppression measure limits its value for correlation with clinical measures. Reliability can be increased either by improving measurement methods or by reducing or eliminating sources of variance in the recordings. In this paper, the effect on P50 amplitude and suppression of variation in wakeful alertness within an experimental session was examined in 20 normal subjects. The percentage of beta power in the interval immediately prior to the P50 stimuli was used as an index of alertness. P50 amplitudes or C-T ratios were estimated using peak-picking and using the singular value decomposition (SVD) method. No effects of variation of wakeful alertness were observed on any P50 amplitude or suppression measure. Comparing the peak-picking vs SVD estimates replicated our prior results showing markedly higher reliabilities with SVD. We conclude: 1) that variation within an experimental session in wakeful alertness level as indexed by the percentage of beta power does not affect P50 amplitude or suppression, and 2) the SVD method brings the reliability of the C-T ratio up to levels where its usefulness in clinical studies can be examined.
听觉P50事件相关电位的波幅和抑制作用可能有助于研究精神分裂症和药物滥用;然而,P50抑制测量的低可靠性限制了其与临床测量结果相关性的价值。可以通过改进测量方法或减少或消除记录中的变异性来源来提高可靠性。在本文中,对20名正常受试者在实验过程中清醒警觉性变化对P50波幅和抑制作用的影响进行了研究。P50刺激前即刻时间段内的β波功率百分比被用作警觉性指标。使用峰值检测法和奇异值分解(SVD)法估计P50波幅或C-T比率。未观察到清醒警觉性变化对任何P50波幅或抑制测量有影响。比较峰值检测法和SVD估计结果,重现了我们之前的结果,即SVD的可靠性明显更高。我们得出结论:1)以β波功率百分比为指标的实验过程中清醒警觉性水平的变化不会影响P50波幅或抑制,2)SVD方法将C-T比率的可靠性提高到了可以检验其在临床研究中有用性的水平。