Cajulis R S, Hessel R G, Frias-Hidvegi D, Yu G H
Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Acta Cytol. 1997 Mar-Apr;41(2):313-20. doi: 10.1159/000332518.
To determine the reproducibility of two clinically proven grading systems for breast carcinoma assessed by private practice pathologists.
Twenty fine needle aspiration (FNA) slides of histologically proven breast carcinoma were submitted to 15 private practice pathologists practicing in 11 separate groups who interpret cytology as part of their daily practice. The pathologists received the same set of slides. They graded the FNAs using the modified Black (MB) (grades 1-3) and simplified Black (SB) (low grade, high grade) grading systems. Specified criteria and guidelines as well as case samples were provided.
There was complete agreement among the 15 pathologists on only one case using the MB grading system as compared to five using the SB grading system. In MB, > or = 10 pathologists were in agreement on 14 cases as compared to 19 cases using SB. There were three cases in MB where the grades ranged from 1 to 3. Also noted in MB was the high number of cases graded 2 (intermediate grade). The predominant comment made by the pathologists was the easier, more objective and practical application of the SB.
High reproducibility in the cytologic grading of FNA of breast carcinoma can be more readily attained among private practice pathologists using the two-tier SB grading system.
确定由私人执业病理学家评估的两种经临床验证的乳腺癌分级系统的可重复性。
将20张经组织学证实的乳腺癌细针穿刺(FNA)玻片提交给在11个不同组中执业的15名私人执业病理学家,他们将细胞学解读作为日常工作的一部分。病理学家收到相同的一组玻片。他们使用改良的布莱克(MB)(1 - 3级)和简化的布莱克(SB)(低级别、高级别)分级系统对FNA进行分级。提供了特定的标准、指南以及病例样本。
与使用SB分级系统的5例相比,在使用MB分级系统时,15名病理学家仅在1例上达成完全一致。在MB中,≥10名病理学家在14例上达成一致,而使用SB时为19例。在MB中有3例的分级范围为1至3级。在MB中还注意到2级(中级)病例数量较多。病理学家提出的主要意见是SB更容易、更客观且实际应用更方便。
使用两级SB分级系统,私人执业病理学家在乳腺癌FNA细胞学分级中更容易实现高可重复性。