Suppr超能文献

学术生命科学领域研究成果的隐瞒。来自一项针对教师的全国性调查的证据。

Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty.

作者信息

Blumenthal D, Campbell E G, Anderson M S, Causino N, Louis K S

机构信息

Health Policy Research and Development Unit, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1997 Apr 16;277(15):1224-8.

PMID:9103347
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the prevalence and determinants of data-withholding behaviors among academic life scientists.

DESIGN

Mailed survey of 3394 life science faculty in the 50 universities that received the most funding from the National Institutes of Health in 1993.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2167 faculty responded to the survey, a 64% response rate.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Whether respondents delayed publication of their research results for more than 6 months and whether respondents refused to share research results with other university scientists in the last 3 years.

RESULTS

A total of 410 respondents (19.8%) reported that publication of their research results had been delayed by more than 6 months at least once in the last 3 years to allow for patent application, to protect their scientific lead, to slow the dissemination of undesired results, to allow time to negotiate a patent, or to resolve disputes over the ownership of intellectual property. Also, 181 respondents (8.9%) reported refusing to share research results with other university scientists in the last 3 years. In multivariate analysis, participation in an academic-industry research relationship and engagement in the commercialization of university research were significantly associated with delays in publication. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 1.34 (1.07-1.59) and 3.15 (2.88-3.41), respectively. Variables associated with refusing to share results were conducting research similar to the Human Genome Project (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.75-2.42), publication rate (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), and engagement in commercialization of research (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 2.08-2.82).

CONCLUSIONS

Withholding of research results is not a widespread phenomenon among life-science researchers. However, withholding is more common among the most productive and entrepreneurial faculty. These results also suggest that data withholding has affected a significant number of life-science faculty and further study on data-withholding practices is suggested.

摘要

目的

确定学术生命科学家数据隐瞒行为的发生率及其决定因素。

设计

对1993年从美国国立卫生研究院获得最多资金的50所大学的3394名生命科学教员进行邮寄调查。

参与者

共有2167名教员回复了调查,回复率为64%。

观察指标

受访者是否将其研究结果的发表推迟超过6个月,以及受访者在过去3年中是否拒绝与其他大学科学家分享研究结果。

结果

共有410名受访者(19.8%)报告称,在过去3年中,他们的研究结果至少有一次被推迟发表超过6个月,以便申请专利、保护其科学领先地位、减缓不良结果的传播、争取时间谈判专利或解决知识产权归属纠纷。此外,181名受访者(8.9%)报告称在过去3年中拒绝与其他大学科学家分享研究结果。在多变量分析中,参与学术-产业研究关系以及参与大学研究商业化与发表延迟显著相关。优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)分别为1.34(1.07-1.59)和3.15(2.88-3.41)。与拒绝分享结果相关的变量包括进行类似于人类基因组计划的研究(OR,2.09;95%CI,1.75-2.42)、发表率(OR,1.02;95%CI,1.01-1.03)以及参与研究商业化(OR,2.45;95%CI,2.08-2.82)。

结论

在生命科学研究人员中,隐瞒研究结果并非普遍现象。然而,在产出最高和最具创业精神的教员中,隐瞒行为更为常见。这些结果还表明,数据隐瞒已影响到大量生命科学教员,建议对数据隐瞒行为进行进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验