Blumenthal D, Campbell E G, Anderson M S, Causino N, Louis K S
Health Policy Research and Development Unit, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
JAMA. 1997 Apr 16;277(15):1224-8.
To identify the prevalence and determinants of data-withholding behaviors among academic life scientists.
Mailed survey of 3394 life science faculty in the 50 universities that received the most funding from the National Institutes of Health in 1993.
A total of 2167 faculty responded to the survey, a 64% response rate.
Whether respondents delayed publication of their research results for more than 6 months and whether respondents refused to share research results with other university scientists in the last 3 years.
A total of 410 respondents (19.8%) reported that publication of their research results had been delayed by more than 6 months at least once in the last 3 years to allow for patent application, to protect their scientific lead, to slow the dissemination of undesired results, to allow time to negotiate a patent, or to resolve disputes over the ownership of intellectual property. Also, 181 respondents (8.9%) reported refusing to share research results with other university scientists in the last 3 years. In multivariate analysis, participation in an academic-industry research relationship and engagement in the commercialization of university research were significantly associated with delays in publication. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 1.34 (1.07-1.59) and 3.15 (2.88-3.41), respectively. Variables associated with refusing to share results were conducting research similar to the Human Genome Project (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.75-2.42), publication rate (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), and engagement in commercialization of research (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 2.08-2.82).
Withholding of research results is not a widespread phenomenon among life-science researchers. However, withholding is more common among the most productive and entrepreneurial faculty. These results also suggest that data withholding has affected a significant number of life-science faculty and further study on data-withholding practices is suggested.
确定学术生命科学家数据隐瞒行为的发生率及其决定因素。
对1993年从美国国立卫生研究院获得最多资金的50所大学的3394名生命科学教员进行邮寄调查。
共有2167名教员回复了调查,回复率为64%。
受访者是否将其研究结果的发表推迟超过6个月,以及受访者在过去3年中是否拒绝与其他大学科学家分享研究结果。
共有410名受访者(19.8%)报告称,在过去3年中,他们的研究结果至少有一次被推迟发表超过6个月,以便申请专利、保护其科学领先地位、减缓不良结果的传播、争取时间谈判专利或解决知识产权归属纠纷。此外,181名受访者(8.9%)报告称在过去3年中拒绝与其他大学科学家分享研究结果。在多变量分析中,参与学术-产业研究关系以及参与大学研究商业化与发表延迟显著相关。优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)分别为1.34(1.07-1.59)和3.15(2.88-3.41)。与拒绝分享结果相关的变量包括进行类似于人类基因组计划的研究(OR,2.09;95%CI,1.75-2.42)、发表率(OR,1.02;95%CI,1.01-1.03)以及参与研究商业化(OR,2.45;95%CI,2.08-2.82)。
在生命科学研究人员中,隐瞒研究结果并非普遍现象。然而,在产出最高和最具创业精神的教员中,隐瞒行为更为常见。这些结果还表明,数据隐瞒已影响到大量生命科学教员,建议对数据隐瞒行为进行进一步研究。