Bruder G E, Stewart J W, Mercier M A, Agosti V, Leite P, Donovan S, Quitkin F M
Department of Biopsychology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York 10032, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1997 Feb;106(1):138-44. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.106.1.138.
Unmedicated depressed outpatients were tested on dichotic syllable and complex tone tests prior to receiving 16 weekly sessions of cognitive therapy (n = 31) or 6-12 weeks of placebo treatment (n = 45). Cognitive-therapy responders had twice the right-ear (left hemisphere) advantage for syllables when compared with nonresponders but did not differ from nonresponders on the nonverbal task. The larger right-ear advantage in cognitive-therapy responders was due to better right-ear accuracy; they did not differ from nonresponders in left-ear accuracy. No differences in perceptual asymmetry or accuracy were found between placebo responders and nonresponders. Right-ear accuracy for syllables was the best predictor of response to cognitive therapy in a logistic regression analysis. The findings suggest that greater left-hemisphere advantage for verbal processing is associated with more favorable outcome of cognitive therapy for depression.
未接受药物治疗的抑郁症门诊患者在接受为期16周的认知疗法(n = 31)或6 - 12周的安慰剂治疗(n = 45)之前,接受了双耳分听音节和复合音测试。与无反应者相比,认知疗法有反应者在音节的右耳(左半球)优势方面是其两倍,但在非语言任务上与无反应者没有差异。认知疗法有反应者更大的右耳优势是由于右耳准确性更高;他们在左耳准确性方面与无反应者没有差异。在安慰剂有反应者和无反应者之间未发现感知不对称或准确性方面的差异。在逻辑回归分析中,音节的右耳准确性是认知疗法反应的最佳预测指标。研究结果表明,言语加工中更大的左半球优势与抑郁症认知疗法更有利的结果相关。