Suppr超能文献

远端食管温度与“深部”温度及气管温度的比较。

Comparison of distal oesophageal temperature with "deep" and tracheal temperatures.

作者信息

Matsukawa T, Sessler D I, Ozaki M, Hanagata K, Iwashita H, Kumazawa T

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Yamanashi Medical University, Japan.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1997 Apr;44(4):433-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03014466.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare distal oesophageal (reference) temperature with "deep-sternal," "deep-forehead," and tracheal temperatures, establishing the accuracy and precision of each.

METHODS

We studied 20 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for gynaecological surgery. Their lungs were mechanically ventilated with a circle system, at a fresh-gas flow rate of 6 L.min-1 Respiratory gases were not warmed or humidified. Tracheal temperatures were recorded from a Trachelon tube inserted approximately 21 cm. Deep-body temperatures were measured at the sternum and forehead using a Coretemp thermometer. The principle of the method is to null thermal flux through a cutaneous disk, thus obliterating thermal gradients between the sides of the disk, skin surface, and subcutaneous tissues. Distal oesophageal temperatures were measured from thermocouples incorporated into oesophageal stethoscopes. Tracheal and deep-tissue temperatures were compared with oesophageal temperature using regression and Bland and Altman analyses.

RESULTS

Tracheal, sternal, and forehead temperatures correlated similarly with distal oesophageal temperature, correlation coefficients (r2) being 0.7 in each case. The offset (oesophageal temperature minus study site) was considerably larger for tracheal temperature (0.7 degree C) than for the other sites (0.2 degree C). However, the precision was only 0.3 degree C at each site.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that tracheal temperatures may not be an adequate substitute for conventional core-temperature monitoring sites. In contrast, the accuracy and precision of deep-tissue temperature monitoring at the sternum and forehead was sufficient for clinical use.

摘要

目的

比较食管远端(参考)温度与“胸骨深部”、“前额深部”及气管温度,确定每种温度测量方法的准确性和精确性。

方法

我们研究了20例接受妇科手术全身麻醉的患者。使用循环系统对其肺部进行机械通气,新鲜气流速为6L·min⁻¹。呼吸气体未进行加热或加湿。通过插入约21cm处的Trachelon导管记录气管温度。使用Coretemp温度计测量胸骨和前额的深部体温。该方法的原理是使通过皮肤盘的热通量为零,从而消除盘两侧、皮肤表面和皮下组织之间的热梯度。通过集成在食管听诊器中的热电偶测量食管远端温度。使用回归分析以及Bland和Altman分析将气管和深部组织温度与食管温度进行比较。

结果

气管、胸骨和前额温度与食管远端温度的相关性相似,每种情况下的相关系数(r²)均为0.7。气管温度的偏移(食管温度减去研究部位温度)(0.7℃)比其他部位(0.2℃)大得多。然而,每个部位的精确性仅为0.3℃。

结论

我们的数据表明,气管温度可能不足以替代传统的核心温度监测部位。相比之下,胸骨和前额深部组织温度监测的准确性和精确性足以用于临床。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验