Junghöfer M, Elbert T, Leiderer P, Berg P, Rockstroh B
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany.
Brain Topogr. 1997 Spring;9(3):203-17. doi: 10.1007/BF01190389.
This paper describes a uniform method for calculating the interpolation of scalp EEG potential distribution, the current source density (CSD), the cortical potential distribution (cortical mapping) and the CSD of the cortical potential distribution. It will be shown that interpolation and deblurring methods such as CSD or cortical mapping are not independent of the inverse problem in potential theory. Not only the resolution but also the accuracy of these techniques, especially those of deblurring, depend greatly on the spatial sampling rate (i.e., the number of electrodes). Using examples from simulated and real (64 channels) data it can be shown that the application of more than 100 EEG channels is not only favourable but necessary to guarantee a reasonable accuracy in the calculations of CSD or cortical mapping. Likewise, it can be shown that using more than 250 electrodes does not improve the resolution.
本文描述了一种统一的方法,用于计算头皮脑电图电位分布、电流源密度(CSD)、皮质电位分布(皮质图谱)以及皮质电位分布的CSD的插值。结果将表明,诸如CSD或皮质图谱等插值和去模糊方法并非独立于电位理论中的逆问题。这些技术的分辨率和准确性,尤其是去模糊技术,很大程度上取决于空间采样率(即电极数量)。通过模拟数据和实际(64通道)数据的示例可以表明,使用超过100个脑电图通道不仅有利,而且对于保证CSD或皮质图谱计算的合理准确性是必要的。同样,可以表明使用超过250个电极并不会提高分辨率。