Suppr超能文献

腹主动脉瘤修复术后患者腰段和胸段硬膜外使用麻醉性镇痛药进行术后镇痛的比较。

Comparison of lumbar and thoracic epidural narcotics for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

作者信息

Gold M S, Rockman C B, Riles T S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997 Apr;11(2):137-40. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(97)90202-0.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is an advantage of thoracic over lumbar epidural narcotics for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

DESIGN

A prospective randomized study.

SETTING

Subjects were inpatients at an academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-two patients scheduled for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects were randomly assigned to receive lumbar or thoracic epidural narcotics. Group 1 (n = 26) had lumbar, and group 2 (n = 26) had thoracic epidural catheters placed preoperatively. All patients were monitored with pulmonary artery catheters and arterial catheters, and had general endotracheal anesthesia, in addition to epidural anesthesia with 2% lidocaine. All patients received 5 mg of epidural morphine after intubation. Pain scores were monitored hourly for 36 hours using a visual analog scale, and additional narcotics were given, depending on the level of pain. Complications caused by epidural narcotics were recorded.

RESULTS

There was no difference between groups as to the daily dose of narcotics or the time between narcotic doses. Hourly pain scores showed significant differences during hours 6, 7, 8, 20, 34, and 36, with pain scores being lower in group 1. There was no difference in the rate of complications between the groups.

CONCLUSION

There is no advantage of thoracic over lumbar epidural analgesia using morphine in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

摘要

目的

确定在接受腹主动脉瘤修复术的患者中,胸段硬膜外给予麻醉药用于术后镇痛是否优于腰段硬膜外给药。

设计

一项前瞻性随机研究。

地点

研究对象为一所学术医疗中心的住院患者。

参与者

52例计划接受择期腹主动脉瘤修复术的患者。

干预措施

研究对象被随机分配接受腰段或胸段硬膜外麻醉药。第1组(n = 26)接受腰段硬膜外麻醉,第2组(n = 26)在术前放置胸段硬膜外导管。所有患者均使用肺动脉导管和动脉导管进行监测,并在硬膜外使用2%利多卡因麻醉的基础上接受全身气管内麻醉。所有患者在插管后接受5 mg硬膜外吗啡。使用视觉模拟量表每小时监测疼痛评分36小时,并根据疼痛程度给予额外的麻醉药。记录硬膜外麻醉药引起的并发症。

结果

两组在麻醉药每日剂量或麻醉药给药间隔时间方面无差异。每小时疼痛评分在第6、7、8、20、34和36小时显示出显著差异,第1组的疼痛评分较低。两组并发症发生率无差异。

结论

在接受腹主动脉瘤修复术的患者中,使用吗啡进行胸段硬膜外镇痛并不优于腰段硬膜外镇痛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验