Suppr超能文献

针对妇女的暴力行为:急诊科医护人员进行干预的障碍

Violence against women: provider barriers to intervention in emergency departments.

作者信息

McGrath M E, Bettacchi A, Duffy S J, Peipert J F, Becker B M, St Angelo L

机构信息

Rhode Island Rape Crisis Center, Providence, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 1997 Apr;4(4):297-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03552.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine: 1) provider behavior in screening for domestic violence (DV) and sexual assault (SA); 2) provider training in DV and SA; 3) provider knowledge of available protocols for DV and SA; and 4) provider perception of barriers to intervention.

METHODS

Anonymous, structured surveys were distributed to physicians, nurses, and social workers at an adult ED trauma center, an affiliated pediatric ED, and a women's urgent care center between July and September 1995.

RESULTS

Of 207 staff members (59%) responding, 54% and 68% indicated that they never/rarely screen for DV or SA, respectively. Thirty-five percent had received no DV training and 27% had received no SA training. Thirty-one percent of the staff had knowledge of existing protocols for DV and 63% had knowledge of existing protocols for SA. Providers trained in DV were more likely to screen for DV (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.27-1.92, p < or = 0.001) and SA (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.24-1.79, p < or = 0.0018), and providers trained in SA were more likely to screen for SA (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.13-1.54, p = 0.0019) and DV (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.13-1.60, p = 0.0007). Barriers that the majority of staff experienced in the care of DV/SA victims included: frustration that the victim would return to an abusive partner, concerns about misdiagnosis, lack of time, personal discomfort, reluctance to intrude into familial privacy, and lack of 24-hour social service support.

CONCLUSION

Providers surveyed had received little training in and rarely screen for violence, and there are a range of personal and institutional barriers impeding intervention with victims of SA and DV. Institutional changes to enhance training and support providers working in the front line of this epidemic may improve services for victims of violence.

摘要

目的

确定:1)医疗服务提供者在筛查家庭暴力(DV)和性侵犯(SA)方面的行为;2)医疗服务提供者在DV和SA方面接受的培训;3)医疗服务提供者对可用的DV和SA协议的了解;4)医疗服务提供者对干预障碍的看法。

方法

1995年7月至9月期间,向一家成人急诊科创伤中心、一家附属儿科急诊科和一家妇女紧急护理中心的医生、护士和社会工作者发放了匿名结构化调查问卷。

结果

在207名回复的工作人员(59%)中,分别有54%和68%的人表示他们从未/很少筛查DV或SA。35%的人未接受过DV培训,27%的人未接受过SA培训。31%的工作人员了解现有的DV协议,63%的人了解现有的SA协议。接受过DV培训的医疗服务提供者更有可能筛查DV(相对风险1.5,95%置信区间1.27 - 1.92,p≤0.001)和SA(相对风险1.49,95%置信区间1.24 - 1.79,p≤0.0018),接受过SA培训的医疗服务提供者更有可能筛查SA(相对风险1.32,95%置信区间1.13 - 1.54,p = 0.0019)和DV(相对风险1.35,95%置信区间1.13 - 1.60,p = 0.0007)。大多数工作人员在照顾DV/SA受害者时遇到的障碍包括:对受害者会回到虐待伴侣身边感到沮丧、担心误诊、时间不足、个人不适、不愿侵犯家庭隐私以及缺乏24小时社会服务支持。

结论

接受调查的医疗服务提供者在暴力方面接受的培训很少,很少进行筛查,并且存在一系列个人和机构障碍阻碍对SA和DV受害者的干预。加强培训并支持一线工作人员的机构变革可能会改善对暴力受害者的服务。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验