Sixsmith D M, Weissman L, Constant F
New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens, Flushing, Department of Emergency Medicine, Flushing 11355, USA. dmsixsmi%
Acad Emerg Med. 1997 Apr;4(4):301-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03553.x.
To determine whether telephone follow-up of selected female patients seen in an urban ED would improve domestic violence (DV) case finding.
A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on consecutive female patients between the ages of 16 and 65 years treated in an urban trauma center during July and August 1995. Record review identified those patients with conditions suggesting increased risk for DV: injury; substance abuse; complaints or diagnoses related to stress, anxiety, depression, or panic attack; or complaints of headache, nonspecific abdominal pain, generalized fatigue, or numbness lasting > 1 week. Attempts were made to telephone all patients who had high-risk presentations within 3 days of their emergency visits. Patients were contacted by a trained interviewer regarding the circumstances of their visits.
There were 142 (9%) high-risk presentations out of 1,500 ED visits by women. Of these high-risk visits, 68 patients denied DV, 19 patients did no speak English, 16 patients gave an incorrect telephone number, 18 patients could not be reached after 3 telephone calls, and 6 patients did not give a telephone number. Of the remaining 15 patients, 5 were diagnosed at the initial visit as having experienced DV, and 10 admitted on the follow-up call that the visit had been related to DV or emotional stress at home.
A structured interview, conducted via telephone in follow-up of released ED patients, identified an additional 10 victims out of 142 high-risk presentations and 1,500 total ED presentations. This approach is labor-intensive, with a relatively low yield. Nonetheless, prospective identification of selective high-risk cases by physicians, coupled with subsequent social service telephone contact, may be a complement in department case finding.
确定对城市急诊科就诊的部分女性患者进行电话随访是否会改善家庭暴力(DV)病例的发现情况。
1995年7月和8月,对一家城市创伤中心收治的16至65岁连续女性患者进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究。通过病历审查确定那些存在提示DV风险增加情况的患者:受伤;药物滥用;与压力、焦虑、抑郁或惊恐发作相关的主诉或诊断;或头痛、非特异性腹痛、全身疲劳或麻木持续超过1周的主诉。在所有急诊就诊后3天内,试图对所有有高风险表现的患者进行电话随访。由一名经过培训的访谈者就其就诊情况与患者联系。
1500例女性急诊就诊患者中有142例(9%)有高风险表现。在这些高风险就诊患者中,68例否认有DV,19例不会说英语,16例提供了错误的电话号码,18例在3次电话随访后无法联系到,6例未提供电话号码。在其余15例患者中,5例在初次就诊时被诊断为曾遭受DV,10例在随访电话中承认此次就诊与家中的DV或情绪压力有关。
通过电话对出院的急诊患者进行随访时进行结构化访谈,在142例高风险表现患者以及总共1500例急诊就诊患者中又识别出了10名受害者。这种方法劳动强度大,收益率相对较低。尽管如此,医生对选择性高风险病例进行前瞻性识别,随后由社会服务部门进行电话联系,可能是科室病例发现工作的一种补充。