Shuer M L, Dietrich M S
Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
West J Med. 1997 Feb;166(2):104-9.
Many athletes train in a constant state of pain or injury while meeting the demands of an elite level program. It is hypothesized that the emotional distress experienced by athletes with chronic injuries is not inconsequential. A self-report battery, the Impact of Event Scale, was administered to 280 inter-collegiate athletes at a division I institution in an attempt to examine their response to chronic injury. Of the 280, 134 (48%) had been injured by study definition, with 117 (42%) meeting the criteria for chronic injury. Athletes with chronic injury scored on the Intrusion subscale of the Impact of Event Scale in the range of those who had experienced natural disasters, but scored higher (P < .05) on the Avoidance/Denial subscale. Their Avoidance subscale scores were similar to those of a group of orthopedic patients who required hospital admission with surgical fixation. Female athletes' Avoidance scores were significantly higher than those of their male peers (P < .05), but no gender differences were seen in intrusive thoughts. Subsets of athletes defined by the duration of injury showed no significant differences on subscale scores. It appears extraordinary that athletes should score in the realm of groups traumatized by natural disasters in intrusive thought and higher in avoidance thought when referring to their chronic injury. Although some attention has been focused on psychiatric intervention for acutely injured athletes or those who have undergone surgical treatment, the psychological needs of athletes struggling with chronic "minor" injuries also appear to merit consideration.
许多运动员在满足精英水平训练计划要求的同时,还处于持续的疼痛或受伤状态。据推测,患有慢性损伤的运动员所经历的情绪困扰并非无关紧要。我们对一所一级院校的280名大学生运动员进行了一项自陈式测评,即事件影响量表,以试图研究他们对慢性损伤的反应。在这280名运动员中,根据研究定义,有134名(48%)受过伤,其中117名(42%)符合慢性损伤的标准。患有慢性损伤的运动员在事件影响量表的侵入性子量表上的得分处于经历过自然灾害的人群范围内,但在回避/否认子量表上得分更高(P<0.05)。他们的回避子量表得分与一组需要住院接受手术固定治疗的骨科患者相似。女运动员的回避得分显著高于男同伴(P<0.05),但在侵入性思维方面未发现性别差异。根据受伤持续时间定义的运动员亚组在各子量表得分上无显著差异。当提及他们的慢性损伤时,运动员在侵入性思维方面得分处于受自然灾害创伤的人群范围内,而在回避思维方面得分更高,这似乎非同寻常。尽管一些注意力已集中在对急性受伤运动员或接受手术治疗的运动员的心理干预上,但与慢性“轻度”损伤作斗争的运动员的心理需求似乎也值得关注。