• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教师发展研究的未来方向。

Future directions for research on faculty development.

作者信息

Irby D M, Hekelman F P

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Fam Med. 1997 Apr;29(4):287-9.

PMID:9110167
Abstract

Based on prior research and current public policy needs, this article identifies five areas that should receive priority in future research on faculty development: 1) To conduct research, greater clarity is needed about the components, competencies, and strategies of faculty development. 2) A stronger link needs to be created between assessment and outcomes of faculty development programs. 3) As faculty roles and career paths change, greater understanding of the nature of professional development is needed. Strategies for promoting teaching, research, and leadership skills require further study. 4) Organizational culture and structure require greater description and illumination as contributors to organizational vitality. 5) Information and instructional technology offer new opportunities for faculty development, but research is needed to determine appropriate uses. Since research takes place in a broader context of societal needs and resources, we conclude with public policy recommendations. We strongly recommend that government, foundations, and universities work together to support fundamental research on faculty development.

摘要

基于先前的研究和当前的公共政策需求,本文确定了未来教师发展研究中应优先关注的五个领域:1)为开展研究,需要更清晰地了解教师发展的组成部分、能力和策略。2)需要在教师发展项目的评估与成果之间建立更紧密的联系。3)随着教师角色和职业道路的变化,需要更深入地理解专业发展的本质。促进教学、研究和领导技能的策略需要进一步研究。4)组织文化和结构作为组织活力的贡献因素,需要更详细的描述和阐释。5)信息和教学技术为教师发展提供了新机会,但需要开展研究以确定其适当用途。由于研究是在更广泛的社会需求和资源背景下进行的,我们最后提出了公共政策建议。我们强烈建议政府、基金会和大学共同努力,支持关于教师发展的基础研究。

相似文献

1
Future directions for research on faculty development.教师发展研究的未来方向。
Fam Med. 1997 Apr;29(4):287-9.
2
Clinical teaching improvement: past and future for faculty development.临床教学改进:教师发展的过去与未来
Fam Med. 1997 Apr;29(4):252-7.
3
Future faculty development in family medicine.家庭医学未来的师资发展。
Fam Med. 1997 Apr;29(4):290-3.
4
A study of federally funded faculty development in family medicine from 1978-1981.
Fam Med. 1985 Mar-Apr;17(2):50-6.
5
Commentary: faculty development: the road less traveled.述评:教师发展:人迹罕至的路。
Acad Med. 2011 Apr;86(4):409-11. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820c6fd3.
6
Resource materials for faculty development.教师发展的资源材料。
Fam Med. 1997 Apr;29(4):275-9.
7
Faculty development needs in residency redesign for practice in patient-centered medical homes: a P4 report.以患者为中心的医疗之家实践中住院医师培训重新设计的师资发展需求:一份P4报告。
Fam Med. 2012 Jun;44(6):387-95.
8
Managing and communicating information in a new era.在新时代管理和交流信息。
Fam Med. 1997 Apr;29(4):270-4.
9
Our back pages: faculty development and the evolution of family medicine.
Fam Med. 1997 Apr;29(4):233-6.
10
Preparing faculty to teach managing care competencies: lessons learned from a national faculty development program.培养教师教授管理式医疗能力:从一项全国性教师发展项目中汲取的经验教训。
Fam Med. 2004 Jan;36 Suppl:S115-20.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact and effectiveness of faculty development program in fostering the faculty's knowledge, skills, and professional competence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.教师发展计划在培养教师知识、技能和专业能力方面的影响与效果:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019 May;26(4):688-697. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.10.024. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
2
Integrating behavioral and social sciences components into a competency-based MD program curriculum: A qualitative study on opinions of faculty members.将行为科学和社会科学内容融入基于能力的医学博士项目课程:一项关于教员意见的定性研究
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017 Mar 1;31:17. doi: 10.18869/mjiri.31.17. eCollection 2017.
3
Developing medical educators--a mixed method evaluation of a teaching education program.
培养医学教育者——教学教育计划的混合方法评估。
Med Educ Online. 2014 Mar 27;19:23868. doi: 10.3402/meo.v19.23868. eCollection 2014.