Brahen L S, Capone T, Wiechert V, Desiderio D
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1977 Oct;34(10):1181-4. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1977.01770220063007.
The induction side effects of cyclazocine and naltrexone were compared in double-blind placebo-controlled studies involving 40 patients (20 for each drug). These studies were carried out with a twice-a-day dosage regimen. Naltrexone produced fewer side effects than cyclazocine. Naltrexone side effects fell to levels indistinguishable from those of placebo in the "induction after placebo" phase. In contrast, cyclazocine "induction after placebo" produced an even higher level of side effects than found in its induction. In no case was naltrexone discontinued because of side effects. On the other hand, three of 20 cyclazocine-treated patients discontinued the drug because of distressing side effects. No toxicity was noted with either agent. The controlled data reported supports the clinical impression that naltrexone produces fewer induction side effects than cyclazocine.
在一项涉及40名患者(每种药物20名)的双盲安慰剂对照研究中,比较了环唑辛和纳曲酮的诱导副作用。这些研究采用每日两次的给药方案进行。纳曲酮产生的副作用比环唑辛少。在“安慰剂后诱导”阶段,纳曲酮的副作用降至与安慰剂难以区分的水平。相比之下,环唑辛“安慰剂后诱导”产生的副作用水平甚至高于其诱导阶段。在任何情况下,纳曲酮都没有因副作用而停药。另一方面,20名接受环唑辛治疗的患者中有3名因严重副作用而停药。两种药物均未观察到毒性。所报告的对照数据支持了纳曲酮比环唑辛产生更少诱导副作用的临床印象。