Lamon J M, Frykholm B C, Tschudy D P
Arch Neurol. 1977 Nov;34(11):709-12. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1977.00500230079014.
Two recognized screening procedures for rapid evaluation of urinary porphobilinogen (PBG) concentrations are compared with quantitative PBG determinations (expressed as mg/24 hours and as a concentration in urine, mg/liter). One hundred ninety-one 24-hour urine specimens from 74 patients with suspected or documented acute type porphyria are included in this investigation. The two screening tests are compared with regard to sensitivity and method of performance. In this study, the Watson-Schwartz and Hoesch tests are positive at PBG concentrations in urine greater than 9 mg/liter. Both methods produced the characteristic pink color only once at a concentration below 3 mg/liter. Both methods are useful in detecting the abnormal concentration of urinary PBG observed during an acute porphyric attack. The Hoesch procedure provides a simple and rapid evaluation of urinary PBG. Positive results from either screening test demand quantitative urinary PBG determinations to confirm the suspected abnormality.
将两种公认的用于快速评估尿卟胆原(PBG)浓度的筛查方法与定量PBG测定(以mg/24小时表示,并以尿中浓度mg/升表示)进行比较。本研究纳入了74例疑似或确诊为急性卟啉病患者的191份24小时尿液标本。比较了这两种筛查试验的敏感性和操作方法。在本研究中,当尿中PBG浓度大于9mg/升时,沃森-施瓦茨试验和霍施试验呈阳性。两种方法仅在浓度低于3mg/升时出现过一次特征性粉红色。两种方法都有助于检测急性卟啉病发作期间观察到的尿PBG异常浓度。霍施方法可对尿PBG进行简单快速的评估。任何一种筛查试验的阳性结果都需要进行尿PBG定量测定以确认疑似异常。