Slawecki C J, Samson H H, Hodge C W
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1997 Apr;21(2):250-60.
Increased reinforcing efficacy of sucrose/ethanol solutions in comparison to sucrose solutions has been previously demonstrated. However, the contribution of the components of the sucrose/ethanol solution is not well defined. The present study used a multiple schedule of reinforcement to evaluate the differential changes in reinforcer presentations as sucrose or ethanol concentrations were altered. Male Long-Evans rats were trained to press a lever on a multiple fixed ratio 4-fixed ratio 4 schedule which was composed of alternating 2-min components. During one component, 5% sucrose/10% ethanol was presented as the reinforcer and, in the second component, 5% sucrose was presented. Independent manipulations of the ethanol concentration (0, 5, and 20%) in the sucrose/ethanol solution or sucrose concentration (0, 10, and 20%) in the sucrose solution were then performed. Increasing the ethanol concentration in the sucrose/ethanol solution resulted in decreases in reinforcer delivery but increases in ethanol intake (grams per kilogram) and total session caloric intake. Increasing the sucrose concentration in the sucrose solution resulted in significant increases in sucrose reinforcer delivery and total session caloric intake. During the concentration manipulations, the number of reinforcers presented of the unchanged reinforcer was not affected. Differential changes in the pattern of reinforcer presentation after ethanol and sucrose concentration manipulations during successive access periods suggest that sucrose and sucrose/ethanol maintained responding are differentially regulated. Changes in sucrose maintained responding after increases in the sucrose concentration were observed early in the session suggesting a strong influence of taste in regulating intake. Changes in sucrose/ethanol maintained responding after increases in the ethanol concentration occurred later in the session and suggest that postingestive effects (i.e., pharmacology) play a major role in the regulation of sucrose/ethanol intake. In addition, the differential patterns of sucrose/ethanol and sucrose maintained behavior suggest that the ethanol component of the sucrose/ethanol solution plays an important role in maintaining sucrose/ethanol reinforced behavior.
先前已证明,与蔗糖溶液相比,蔗糖/乙醇溶液的强化效力增强。然而,蔗糖/乙醇溶液各成分的作用尚未明确界定。本研究采用多重强化程序,以评估随着蔗糖或乙醇浓度改变,强化物呈现的差异变化。雄性Long-Evans大鼠接受训练,在由交替的2分钟成分组成的多重固定比率4-固定比率4程序上按压杠杆。在一个成分期间,呈现5%蔗糖/10%乙醇作为强化物,在第二个成分期间,呈现5%蔗糖。然后分别对蔗糖/乙醇溶液中的乙醇浓度(0%、5%和20%)或蔗糖溶液中的蔗糖浓度(0%、10%和20%)进行独立操控。增加蔗糖/乙醇溶液中的乙醇浓度会导致强化物递送减少,但乙醇摄入量(克/千克)和总实验热量摄入量增加。增加蔗糖溶液中的蔗糖浓度会导致蔗糖强化物递送和总实验热量摄入量显著增加。在浓度操控期间,未改变的强化物呈现的次数不受影响。在连续获取期内,乙醇和蔗糖浓度操控后强化物呈现模式的差异变化表明,蔗糖和蔗糖/乙醇维持的反应受到不同调节。蔗糖浓度增加后,蔗糖维持的反应变化在实验早期就已观察到,这表明味道在调节摄入量方面有很大影响。乙醇浓度增加后,蔗糖/乙醇维持的反应变化在实验后期出现,这表明摄入后效应(即药理学)在蔗糖/乙醇摄入量的调节中起主要作用。此外,蔗糖/乙醇和蔗糖维持行为的差异模式表明,蔗糖/乙醇溶液中的乙醇成分在维持蔗糖/乙醇强化行为中起重要作用。