Suppr超能文献

与当地年龄/性别匹配的对照组相比,来自社区人群的糖尿病患者的死亡率。

Mortality rates in diabetic patients from a community-based population compared to local age/sex matched controls.

作者信息

Gatling W, Tufail S, Mullee M A, Westacott T A, Hill R D

机构信息

Department of Diabetes, Poole Hospital NHS Trust, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 1997 Apr;14(4):316-20. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199704)14:4<316::AID-DIA328>3.0.CO;2-0.

Abstract

Using a population-based cohort from 10 general practices in East Dorset, the mortality rate of diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic controls was investigated during 8 years follow-up. From a total population of 90660, 917 diabetic patients were identified; 693 (75%) with non-insulin-dependent (Type 2) diabetes and 224 (25%) with insulin-dependent (Type 1) diabetes. A control group of 917 non-diabetic subjects were selected, matched by age and sex. After 8 years, significantly more diabetic patients (334 or 36.4%) had died than controls (219 or 24%), (odds ratio (OR) 1.99, 95% CI 1.60-2.47). Compared with the controls, the odds ratio of all causes of mortality for diabetic men was 1.89 (CI 1.4-2.54) and for diabetic women 2.16 (CI 1.57-2.96). Compared with controls, the odds ratio for mortality from circulatory disease was significantly increased for diabetic patients 2.0 (CI 1.5-2.6) but mortality for respiratory disease or neoplasms was not significantly different (OR 0.7, CI 0.4-1.2 and OR 0.7, CI 0.6-1.0, respectively). Control data were lower than would be expected from national database data. The diabetic population had a significantly higher mortality than controls, both from all causes and circulatory diseases. Our data incidentally show the importance of appropriate controls for estimating the impact of a chronic disease.

摘要

利用东多塞特郡10家普通诊所的人群队列,在8年随访期间对糖尿病患者与非糖尿病对照者的死亡率进行了调查。在总计90660人的人群中,识别出917名糖尿病患者;其中693人(75%)患有非胰岛素依赖型(2型)糖尿病,224人(25%)患有胰岛素依赖型(1型)糖尿病。选取了917名非糖尿病受试者作为对照组,按照年龄和性别进行匹配。8年后,死亡的糖尿病患者(334人或36.4%)明显多于对照组(219人或24%),(优势比(OR)为1.99,95%置信区间为1.60 - 2.47)。与对照组相比,糖尿病男性所有死因的优势比为1.89(置信区间为1.4 - 2.54),糖尿病女性为2.16(置信区间为1.57 - 2.96)。与对照组相比,糖尿病患者因循环系统疾病导致的死亡优势比显著升高,为2.0(置信区间为1.5 - 2.6),但呼吸系统疾病或肿瘤导致的死亡与对照组无显著差异(优势比分别为0.7,置信区间为0.4 - 1.2和优势比为0.7,置信区间为0.6 - 1.0)。对照数据低于国家数据库数据的预期值。糖尿病患者人群的死亡率在所有死因和循环系统疾病方面均显著高于对照组。我们的数据顺便显示了合适的对照对于评估慢性病影响的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验