• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic status and the prevention of child home injuries: a survey of parents of preschool children.社会经济地位与儿童家庭伤害预防:一项对学龄前儿童家长的调查
Inj Prev. 1997 Mar;3(1):29-34. doi: 10.1136/ip.3.1.29.
2
Reliability and validity of the injury prevention project home safety survey.伤害预防项目家庭安全调查的信度与效度
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Aug;161(8):759-65. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.8.759.
3
Parents' beliefs about children and gun safety.父母对儿童及枪支安全的看法。
Pediatr Nurs. 2005 Sep-Oct;31(5):374-9.
4
Parents' Attitudes and Adherence to Unintentional Injury Prevention Measures in Ankara, Turkey.土耳其安卡拉的父母对意外伤害预防措施的态度和坚持度。
Balkan Med J. 2017 Aug 4;34(4):335-342. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2016.1776. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
5
In-home injury prevention practices for infants and toddlers: the role of parental beliefs, barriers, and housing quality.婴幼儿家庭伤害预防措施:父母观念、障碍及住房质量的作用
Health Educ Q. 1995 Feb;22(1):85-95. doi: 10.1177/109019819502200108.
6
Maternal perceptions of supervision in pre-school-aged children: a qualitative approach to understanding differences between families living in affluent and disadvantaged areas.学龄前儿童母亲对监管的认知:一种理解富裕地区与贫困地区家庭差异的质性研究方法
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015 Jul;16(4):346-55. doi: 10.1017/S1463423614000218. Epub 2014 May 29.
7
Risk for household safety hazards: Socioeconomic and sociodemographic factors.家庭安全隐患风险:社会经济和社会人口因素。
J Safety Res. 2014 Dec;51:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
8
Parent's adherence to children's home-accident preventive measures.家长对儿童家居意外预防措施的依从性。
Int Nurs Rev. 2009 Sep;56(3):369-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2009.00720.x.
9
Evaluation of Safe Kids Week 2001: prevention of scald and burn injuries in young children.2001年儿童安全周评估:预防幼儿烫伤和烧伤。
Inj Prev. 2003 Jun;9(2):112-6. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.2.112.
10
Validating self reported home safety practices in a culturally diverse non-inner city population.在文化多元的非市中心人群中验证自我报告的家庭安全措施。
Inj Prev. 2006 Feb;12(1):52-7. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.009399.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge and attitude of children safety at home among population in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯民众对儿童居家安全的认知与态度。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Mar;11(3):955-962. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_508_21. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
2
Childhood Injury Prevention: Predictors of Home Hazards in Latino Families Enrolled in SafeCare®.儿童伤害预防:参与 SafeCare®的拉丁裔家庭中家居危险的预测因素。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2017 Aug 1;42(7):738-747. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx045.
3
Parental perceptions of barriers and facilitators to preventing child unintentional injuries within the home: a qualitative study.父母对家庭中预防儿童意外伤害的障碍和促进因素的认知:一项定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 24;15:280. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1547-2.
4
Children's perceptions about falls and their prevention: a qualitative study from a rural setting in Bangladesh.儿童对跌倒及其预防的认知:来自孟加拉国农村地区的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 29;13:1022. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1022.
5
Effects of neighbourhood and individual factors on injury risk in the entire Swedish population: a 12-month multilevel follow-up study.邻里和个体因素对瑞典全体人口受伤风险的影响:一项为期12个月的多层次随访研究。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(3):191-203. doi: 10.1007/s10654-007-9219-x. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
6
Poverty and injury risk among children: always together?儿童中的贫困与受伤风险:总是相伴相生吗?
Soz Praventivmed. 2002;47(2):65-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01318382.
7
Banning the "A word": where's the evidence?禁用“那个词”:证据何在?
Inj Prev. 2001 Sep;7(3):172-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.3.172.
8
Accidental injury: risk and preventative interventions.意外伤害:风险与预防干预措施
Arch Dis Child. 1997 Jul;77(1):28-31. doi: 10.1136/adc.77.1.28.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevention of home related injuries of pre-school children: safety measures taken by mothers.预防学龄前儿童家庭相关伤害:母亲采取的安全措施
Health Educ Res. 1993 Jun;8(2):217-31. doi: 10.1093/her/8.2.217.
2
Design a questionnaire.设计一份问卷。
BMJ. 1993 Nov 13;307(6914):1264-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6914.1264.
3
Understanding differences between high and low childhood accident rate areas: the importance of qualitative data.
J Public Health Med. 1994 Dec;16(4):439-46. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a043025.
4
The role of health visitors in the prevention of home accidents involving children: time for a rethink?健康访视员在预防涉及儿童的家庭事故中的作用:是否需要重新思考?
Health Bull (Edinb). 1995 Jan;53(1):20-5.
5
Geographical and social variations in mortality due to childhood accidents in England and Wales 1975-1984.
Public Health. 1990 May;104(3):171-82. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80373-7.

社会经济地位与儿童家庭伤害预防:一项对学龄前儿童家长的调查

Socioeconomic status and the prevention of child home injuries: a survey of parents of preschool children.

作者信息

Evans S A, Kohli H S

机构信息

Department of Public Health Medicine, Lanarkshire Health Board, Hamilton, UK.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 1997 Mar;3(1):29-34. doi: 10.1136/ip.3.1.29.

DOI:10.1136/ip.3.1.29
PMID:9113844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1067760/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effect of socioeconomic status on the attitudes parents of preschool children towards child home safety issues and practice of home safety measures.

SETTING

A community based study in the Lanarkshire Health Board area, a mixed urban-rural setting in central Scotland.

METHODS

A postal survey of two random samples of parents of preschool children (aged 3 years). One sample (A) involved parents living in more affluent areas and the other (B) parents living in less affluent areas.

RESULTS

In general, parents in both groups showed similar attitudes towards home safety. The only significant differences to emerge were over parental perceptions of the safety of the neighbourhood in which they lived and over the availability of money to keep their child safe (group B > group A, p < 0.0042). Parents from group B also tended to report similar or safer levels of home safety behaviour to parents from group A.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings do not suggest that differences in the injury experience of children from more and less affluent backgrounds are due to differences in parental attitude, knowledge, or practice of home safety measures. Thus, the study does not support the selective targeting of families from less affluent areas with educational interventions. Instead, the findings do support the use of a multi-method approach to home safety, where educational approaches are complemented by environmental modification.

摘要

目的

研究社会经济地位对学龄前儿童家长关于儿童家庭安全问题的态度以及家庭安全措施实施情况的影响。

背景

在苏格兰中部城乡结合的拉纳克郡卫生局辖区开展的一项基于社区的研究。

方法

对两组随机抽取的学龄前儿童(3岁)家长进行邮寄问卷调查。一组样本(A)涉及居住在较富裕地区的家长,另一组样本(B)涉及居住在较不富裕地区的家长。

结果

总体而言,两组家长对家庭安全的态度相似。出现的唯一显著差异在于家长对其居住社区安全性的认知以及用于保障孩子安全的资金可得性(B组 > A组,p < 0.0042)。B组家长报告的家庭安全行为水平也往往与A组家长相似或更安全。

结论

研究结果并不表明来自较富裕和较不富裕背景的儿童在受伤经历上的差异是由于家长在家庭安全措施的态度、知识或实践方面的差异所致。因此,该研究不支持对较不富裕地区家庭进行有针对性的教育干预。相反,研究结果确实支持采用多方法的家庭安全措施,其中教育方法辅以环境改善。