Minciotti P, Ceravolo M G, Provinciali L
Istituto delle Malattie del Sistema Nervoso, Università di Ancona, Italy.
Ital J Neurol Sci. 1997 Feb;18(1):21-30. doi: 10.1007/BF02106226.
To assess the clinical use of Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and the reproducibility of TCD reports.
A multicenter survey involving 45 Italian laboratories (the Italian Transcranial Doppler Group-ITDG) was carried out by investigating the examination procedure, the parameters and normative data, and the interpretation criteria applied to reach diagnostic conclusions. The inter-examiner agreement on 10 TCD reports was computed using Kappa statistics. Results. Investigators consider both qualitative (flow direction, signal detectability) and quantitative measurements (mean flow velocity and pulsatility index values), applying their own normative criteria reference which may differ slightly between centers. TCD reports appear to be highly reproducible when based upon the interpretation of qualitative data (Kappa index: 0.95-1.00), whereas a moderate agreement is obtained when considering alterations in quantitative parameters (Kappa: 0.44-0.81).
The application of the same criteria in different laboratories may facilitate the standardization of TCD examinations and support the reproducibility of clinical reports based on TCD parameters.
评估经颅多普勒(TCD)的临床应用及TCD报告的可重复性。
通过调查45家意大利实验室(意大利经颅多普勒研究组-ITDG)的检查程序、参数和规范数据以及用于得出诊断结论的解读标准,开展了一项多中心调查。使用Kappa统计量计算10份TCD报告的检查者间一致性。结果。研究人员同时考虑定性(血流方向、信号可检测性)和定量测量(平均血流速度和搏动指数值),应用各自的规范标准参考,各中心之间可能略有不同。基于定性数据的解读,TCD报告似乎具有高度可重复性(Kappa指数:0.95 - 1.00),而在考虑定量参数变化时,一致性中等(Kappa:0.44 - 0.81)。
在不同实验室应用相同标准可能有助于TCD检查的标准化,并支持基于TCD参数的临床报告的可重复性。