Ikeda L S, Harm S C, Arcuri K E, Goldberg A I, Sweet C S
Clinical Cardiovascular Research, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, USA.
Blood Press. 1997 Jan;6(1):35-43. doi: 10.3109/08037059709086444.
The antihypertensive activity of losartan potassium (losartan, Cozaar), an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, was evaluated in a parallel 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in hypertensive patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. After a 4-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period, which included monitoring of baseline variables, 366 patients with a group mean sitting diastolic blood pressure of 101 +/- 5 (s.d.) mmHg were assigned randomly to one of three treatment groups: placebo, losartan 50 mg, or losartan 50 mg with the option to titrate to 100 mg after the first 6 weeks if the target sitting diastolic blood pressure (< 90 mmHg) was not reached. To assess the potential blood pressure response associated with the act of titration, patients in the placebo and losartan 50 mg treatment groups with a sitting diastolic blood pressure of > or = 90 mmHg at week 6 were mock titrated (changed to a new tablet containing the same study medication and dose). Sitting diastolic blood pressure was also evaluated at the end of the trial during a 1-week off-drug period to assess for rebound hypertension. At week 6, patients in the active-drug-treatment arms experienced significantly greater peak (6 h post-dose) and trough (24 h post-dose) reduction in systolic and diastolic sitting blood pressures compared with placebo (p < or = 0.01). Based on trough blood pressures at week 12, active drug (both arms) was more effective than placebo in lowering sitting diastolic blood pressure, with a very small additional benefit associated with increasing the dose of losartan to 100 mg in patients who did not reach the target blood pressure after the first 6 weeks on losartan 50 mg. There was no evidence of rebound hypertension during 1 week after withdrawal of losartan. The correlation between baseline plasma renin activity and reduction in peak and trough blood pressure at week 12, although statistically significant, was generally poor in the active treatment groups. In this trial, losartan was efficacious and well tolerated, and was similar to placebo with regard to adverse-experience profile. Adverse experiences that could reasonably be related to excessive lowering of blood pressure were not common and there was no evidence of rebound hypertension.
氯沙坦钾(氯沙坦,科素亚)是一种血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂,其降压活性在一项针对轻度至中度高血压患者的为期12周的平行、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中进行了评估。在为期4周的单盲、安慰剂导入期(包括监测基线变量)之后,366名组平均坐位舒张压为101±5(标准差)mmHg的患者被随机分配到三个治疗组之一:安慰剂组、50毫克氯沙坦组,或50毫克氯沙坦组,若在最初6周后未达到目标坐位舒张压(<90 mmHg),则可选择在第6周后滴定至100毫克。为评估与滴定行为相关的潜在血压反应,在第6周时坐位舒张压≥90 mmHg的安慰剂组和50毫克氯沙坦治疗组患者进行了模拟滴定(更换为含有相同研究药物和剂量的新片剂)。在试验结束时的1周停药期也对坐位舒张压进行了评估,以评估反弹性高血压。在第6周时,与安慰剂相比,活性药物治疗组患者的收缩压和舒张压在给药后6小时(峰值)和24小时(谷值)的降低幅度明显更大(p≤0.01)。根据第12周时的谷值血压,活性药物(两组)在降低坐位舒张压方面比安慰剂更有效,对于在最初6周服用50毫克氯沙坦后未达到目标血压的患者,将氯沙坦剂量增加到100毫克仅有非常小的额外益处。停用氯沙坦后1周内没有反弹性高血压的证据。在活性治疗组中,尽管基线血浆肾素活性与第12周时血压峰值和谷值降低之间的相关性具有统计学意义,但总体上相关性较差。在该试验中,氯沙坦有效且耐受性良好,在不良事件方面与安慰剂相似。与血压过度降低合理相关的不良事件并不常见,也没有反弹性高血压的证据。