Moul J W
Urology Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C., USA.
Tech Urol. 1995 Fall;1(3):126-32.
Testicular cancer has become a highly curable neoplasm, and research efforts in the 1990s are focusing on ways to improve staging and treatment so as to limit cost and morbidity. Our group has performed a number of recent studies that help to answer a number of important clinical questions. First, do we need to order computed tomography of the chest (CCT) to stage all newly diagnosed patients? Second, how accurate is contemporary era abdominal CT to stage the retroperitoneum in low-stage nonseminoma patients, and are there techniques that may improve accuracy? Third, can histological primary tumor factors be useful to predict stage in low-stage nonseminoma patients? In a study of 201 testicular cancer patients [117 (58%) NSGCT, 84 (42%) seminoma] who had both CCT and chest X-ray (CXR) in initial staging, CXR alone was found to be sufficient initial chest staging in all seminoma patients and in NSGCT patients who had a negative abdominal (CTA). For low-stage patients without retroperitoneal adenopathy, CCT had unacceptable false-positive rates, which precipitated additional invasive maneuvers. For higher stage NSGCT patients with retroperitoneal disease on initial CTA, CXR alone missed a significant number of occult thoracic metastases and CCT remains indicated. In a study of 57 clinical stage 1 NSGCT all having negative staging CTA followed by surgical staging, third and fourth generation CT had a 67% accuracy in predicting retroperitoneal metastases. This contemporary experience shows a 33% false-negative abdominal CT staging rate. Consideration of any nodes, regardless of size, in the primary echelon retroperitoneal areas as indicative of retroperitoneal metastases may hold promise for improving accuracy of CTA in low-stage NSGCT testis cancer. In a study of 92 clinical stage 1 NSGCT patients, determination of primary tumor vascular invasion (VI) and percentage of tumor composed of embryonal carcinoma component (%EMB) was found to be a useful staging tool. A multivariate model using VI and %EMB was able to predict correct stage in 86% of the study cohort, and a probability table with these two variables was created. Using these histological variables in a neural network artificial intelligence program, an expert correctly predicted stage in 92% of patients. In the 1990s chest staging should be tailored to tumor cell type and retroperitoneal disease status. Staging of the retroperitoneum utilizing abdominal CT remains problematic due to the inability to detect microscopic metastases. Primary tumor histological factors, particularly vascular invasion and quantitation of embryonal carcinoma, are clinically useful staging tools.
睾丸癌已成为一种治愈率很高的肿瘤,20世纪90年代的研究工作主要集中在改进分期和治疗方法,以降低成本和减少发病率。我们小组最近进行了多项研究,有助于回答一些重要的临床问题。首先,对于所有新诊断的患者,我们是否需要进行胸部计算机断层扫描(CCT)来进行分期?其次,当代腹部CT对低分期非精原细胞瘤患者的腹膜后分期有多准确,是否有可提高准确性的技术?第三,组织学原发性肿瘤因素能否用于预测低分期非精原细胞瘤患者的分期?在一项对201例睾丸癌患者(117例(58%)非精原细胞瘤性生殖细胞肿瘤,84例(42%)精原细胞瘤)的研究中,这些患者在初始分期时均进行了CCT和胸部X线(CXR)检查,结果发现,对于所有精原细胞瘤患者以及腹部CT血管造影(CTA)阴性的非精原细胞瘤性生殖细胞肿瘤患者,仅CXR就足以作为初始胸部分期。对于无腹膜后淋巴结肿大的低分期患者,CCT的假阳性率令人无法接受,这导致了额外的侵入性操作。对于初始CTA显示有腹膜后疾病的高分期非精原细胞瘤性生殖细胞肿瘤患者,仅CXR会遗漏大量隐匿性胸段转移灶,因此仍需进行CCT检查。在一项对57例临床分期为1期的非精原细胞瘤性生殖细胞肿瘤患者的研究中,所有患者的分期CTA均为阴性,随后进行手术分期,第三代和第四代CT预测腹膜后转移的准确率为67%。当代的经验表明,腹部CT分期的假阴性率为33%。将腹膜后主要区域的任何淋巴结,无论大小,视为腹膜后转移的指标,可能有望提高低分期非精原细胞瘤性睾丸癌CTA的准确性。在一项对92例临床分期为1期的非精原细胞瘤性生殖细胞肿瘤患者的研究中,发现原发性肿瘤血管侵犯(VI)和肿瘤中胚胎癌成分的百分比(%EMB)是一种有用的分期工具。使用VI和%EMB的多变量模型能够在86%的研究队列中预测正确的分期,并创建了包含这两个变量的概率表。在神经网络人工智能程序中使用这些组织学变量,一位专家能够在92%的患者中正确预测分期。在20世纪90年代,胸部分期应根据肿瘤细胞类型和腹膜后疾病状态进行调整。由于无法检测到微小转移灶,利用腹部CT对腹膜后进行分期仍然存在问题。原发性肿瘤组织学因素,特别是血管侵犯和胚胎癌的定量,是临床上有用的分期工具。